I do believe that I emailed you a link to some videos that you didn't
have on your site back in 2003, though I may be mistaken,
day1-tower1-struck-sm.mov, day1-tower2-fireball.mov
day2-bldg7-wbroad-chambers.mov etc. I found these videos on site
hosted by, ironically, someone that supposedly worked at an ATC
center. (I had intended to send you a link but may have not gotten
around to actually doing it, if so My Bad)
FWIW, your site was the first that I can remember having found
specifically dealing with the no planes reality.
--- In 911InsideJobbers@yahoogroups.com, Rosalee Grable <webfairy@...>
wrote:
>
> So where in the fark were you while I was getting beat up from all
> directions all alone.
> It was more than a year before anybody spoke up for me.
>
> I am effective in internet debate format but the effort to recast my
> long slog from there to here into useful essay makes me need a nap.
>
> I have the video skills now to make a DVD.
> the videos at
> http://thewebfairy.com/911/missilegate/video.htm
> It feels like baling the ocean with a teaspoon tho.
>
> I have learned that videos are unmixed into "elemental streams". These
> elemental streams seem to encode more information than can be expressed
> in the low resolution pixel grid.
> I have no other explanation for why the first hit object(s) make such
> detailed beautyshots while equal enlargement of the Pentagon Art Frames
> reveals flat blobs.
> http://thewebfairy.com/911/flyingpig/beautyshots.htm
> vs.
> http://thewebfairy.com/911/pentagon/frames/startribune/st5_detail.jpg
> On this detail it's particularly evident how the Art Frame has been
> stretched horizontally.
>
>
> perpetualynquisitive wrote:
> > I was in near shock watching the events that morning, the replay of
> > the 'plane' hitting WTC 2 over and over and over and over and, well
> > you get the idea.
> >
> > It was after seeing the Fairbanks interview (Diane Sawyer) and his
> > clip of the plane, when he said "it disappeared like a bad special
> > effect" that caused the light bulb in my head to start blinking
> > "Bingo, IT was a bad special effect!" For when they showed it slow
> > motion, the plane did not react when it impacted the building, it just
> > slipped right into it, like a hand into a glove.
> >
> > I also had a strong feeling of deja vu on 9/11, I was sure that I had
> > seen the WTC heavily damaged before by a big explosion that left a big
> > hole in the building. (it was in early 2002 that I verified that I had
> > indeed seen the WTC in that condition when I picked up "Armageddon" on
> > DVD)
> >
> > In the summer of 2002 I was watching The Simpsons one evening and low
> > behold the episode Sideshow Bob's Last Gleaming comes on. After I
> > heard Homer say "Let's Roll", while chasing a hijacked airplane, which
> > escapes a failed military intercept and then crashes into a building,
> > almost died as I had just had a discussion about the supposed failure
> > to intercept with someone the day before and had told him it was
> > red-herring disinformation to reinforce the 'plane' hoax.
> >
> > He is of the thinking that there must have been a miscommunication
> > with NORAD at best or the military was told to look the other way,
> > such as the case in Pearl Harbour at the very worst.
> >
> > This person is a total military buff, from the war of independence to
> > the present and can name almost every major military/battle statistic,
> > weapon platform, personnel, tactics etc, and he just couldn't
> > understand how the hijacked planes could fly around as long as they
> > did without getting shot out of the sky.
> >
> > As I explaned (hehe) to him, no planes = no airforce failure = no
> > standdown = no reprimands for military personnel.
> >
> > --- In 911InsideJobbers@yahoogroups.com, Rosalee Grable <webfairy@>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> You beat me to figuring out No Planes.
> >> I was intrigued by the Where's The Boeing site, back when I first
heard
> >> of it, March 2002.
> >> I started looking at videos and noticed the plane was missing
>from the
> >> first hit right off.
> >> I thought we would have the crime solved by summer.
> >> I remember getting drunk to celebrate, and to get used to the notion
> >> they used indescribables, not a plane at all.
> >> There would have been no celebration if I'd been able to guess that
> >> people would be barely catching on in 2006, with economic crash and
> >> synthetic terror hard on our heels.
> >> People that stupid deserve to be slaves, is the only answer I've
> >>
> > come up
> >
> >> with.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >>> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
> >>>
> >>> * Visit your group "911InsideJobbers
> >>> <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/911InsideJobbers>" on the web.
> >>>
> >>> * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> >>> 911InsideJobbers-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> >>>
> >>>
> >
<mailto:911InsideJobbers-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>
> >
> >>>
> >>> * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
> >>> Service <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >
------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> --- Ursprüngliche Nachricht ---
> Von: "perpetualynquisitive" <perpetualynquisitive@yahoo.com>
> An: 911InsideJobbers@yahoogroups.com
> Betreff: SV: [Fwd: [911InsideJobbers] Re: Controlled Demolition Limited
> Hangout?]
> Datum: Thu, 09 Feb 2006 16:53:40 -0000
>
Perp,
u still have these files hosted somewhere?
And thx for your quick answer on this CNN clip.
>>>day1-tower1-struck-sm.mov, day1-tower2-fireball.mov
day2-bldg7-wbroad-chambers.mov etc. <<
--
DSL-Aktion wegen großer Nachfrage bis 28.2.2006 verlängert:
GMX DSL-Flatrate 1 Jahr kostenlos* http://www.gmx.net/de/go/dsl
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/911InsideJobbers/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
911InsideJobbers-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
No comments:
Post a Comment