All of us know that the controlled demolition of the Twin towers was
designed to mimic a pancake theory collapse resulting from the point
of impact of jetliners. WTC7 was a conventional demolition because
there was no jetliner crash to simulate.
Question #1. Why wouldn't the desigerns of the twin tower demolition
use pre planted charges, just like they did in the case of WTC7 and
other conventional bottom 1st demolitions? Why do you think they
would want to use electromagnetic weaponry for the simple task of
demolishing the twin towers?
Question #2. Why was Firefighter, other 1st responder as well as live
broadcast civillian eyewitness testimony consistent with controlled
demolition resulting from conventional planted charges? IOW, why
would electromagnetic weaponry result in the "explosions" so many
witnessed?
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/911InsideJobbers/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
911InsideJobbers-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
No comments:
Post a Comment