[911InsideJobbers] Re: Why Electromagnetic Weaponry & Not Planted Charges?

Elevators and HAAP sounds

Just a few steps out of the elevator, he heard a tremendous crash and
what sounded like elevator cars free-falling. Then he saw a fireball
blow out of a shaft. He watched the fireball fold back on itself. His
steps was out into the lobby of the north tower.

This is taken from "102 Minutes" the book by Jim Dwyer and Kevin
Flynn [page 14]

If you heard a noise coming from the elevator shaft that you had not
heard before then it would be reasonable to assume the elevator was
doing something that it doesn't normally do. Get detached from its
cabling and free-falling was a fair assumption for what caused that
noise.

But was it the sound of HAAP at work?

--- In 911InsideJobbers@yahoogroups.com, Rosalee Grable
<webfairy@...> wrote:
>
> I say they used everything but the kitchen sink, and maybe that too.
> It was like the Kennedy assasination, when they had every single
> hit-team on the planet in Dallas that day.
> It was an excuse to keep people arguing this one or that one for 40
> years when the answer was "All of the Above."
>
> Every sentence that begins with "all of us know' needs to be
checked for
> accuracy.
>
> Nothing happens or is evident that the "collapse" in any way mimics
> pancaking.
> Debris was thrown upward
> http://plaguepuppy.net/public_html/video%20archive/projectile.avi
> 7 fell FASTER THAN FREEFALL THRU AIR
> http://plaguepuppy.net/public_html/video%
20archive/911eyewitness_wtc7.wmv
>
> No "conventional" explosive could create the effects found in my
> h-effect directory.
> These are from the History Channel program "Relics from the Rubble"
> http://thewebfairy.com/911/h-effect
>
> "SIMPLE TASK" of making these massive buildings, designed to
withstand
> earthquakes and jet crashes turn to dust??
> http://thewebfairy.com/911/du1
> we knew more in 2003 than you know now.
> SIMPLE TASK??? Simple task. Cripes.
> In your imagination making two of the largest buildings in New York
> crumple straight down into their own footprint was a "simple task."
>
> It is the direct evidence from video of the crime scene
>
>
> inphoman911 wrote:
> > All of us know that the controlled demolition of the Twin towers
was
> > designed to mimic a pancake theory collapse resulting from the
point
> > of impact of jetliners. WTC7 was a conventional demolition
because
> > there was no jetliner crash to simulate.
> >
> >
> > Question #1. Why wouldn't the desigerns of the twin tower
demolition
> > use pre planted charges, just like they did in the case of WTC7
and
> > other conventional bottom 1st demolitions? Why do you think they
> > would want to use electromagnetic weaponry for the simple task of
> > demolishing the twin towers?
> >
> >
> > Question #2. Why was Firefighter, other 1st responder as well as
live
> > broadcast civillian eyewitness testimony consistent with
controlled
> > demolition resulting from conventional planted charges? IOW, why
> > would electromagnetic weaponry result in the "explosions" so many
> > witnessed?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/911InsideJobbers/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
911InsideJobbers-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/