Re: [911InsideJobbers] Why Electromagnetic Weaponry & Not Planted Charges?

I say they used everything but the kitchen sink, and maybe that too.
It was like the Kennedy assasination, when they had every single
hit-team on the planet in Dallas that day.
It was an excuse to keep people arguing this one or that one for 40
years when the answer was "All of the Above."

Every sentence that begins with "all of us know' needs to be checked for
accuracy.

Nothing happens or is evident that the "collapse" in any way mimics
pancaking.
Debris was thrown upward
http://plaguepuppy.net/public_html/video%20archive/projectile.avi
7 fell FASTER THAN FREEFALL THRU AIR
http://plaguepuppy.net/public_html/video%20archive/911eyewitness_wtc7.wmv

No "conventional" explosive could create the effects found in my
h-effect directory.
These are from the History Channel program "Relics from the Rubble"
http://thewebfairy.com/911/h-effect

"SIMPLE TASK" of making these massive buildings, designed to withstand
earthquakes and jet crashes turn to dust??
http://thewebfairy.com/911/du1
we knew more in 2003 than you know now.
SIMPLE TASK??? Simple task. Cripes.
In your imagination making two of the largest buildings in New York
crumple straight down into their own footprint was a "simple task."

It is the direct evidence from video of the crime scene

inphoman911 wrote:
> All of us know that the controlled demolition of the Twin towers was
> designed to mimic a pancake theory collapse resulting from the point
> of impact of jetliners. WTC7 was a conventional demolition because
> there was no jetliner crash to simulate.
>
>
> Question #1. Why wouldn't the desigerns of the twin tower demolition
> use pre planted charges, just like they did in the case of WTC7 and
> other conventional bottom 1st demolitions? Why do you think they
> would want to use electromagnetic weaponry for the simple task of
> demolishing the twin towers?
>
>
> Question #2. Why was Firefighter, other 1st responder as well as live
> broadcast civillian eyewitness testimony consistent with controlled
> demolition resulting from conventional planted charges? IOW, why
> would electromagnetic weaponry result in the "explosions" so many
> witnessed?
>
>
>
>
>

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/911InsideJobbers/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
911InsideJobbers-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/