WF it will be a best seller if you sold it instead of giving it away for the cause. Only those who would buy it would be interested enough to see it.
has got to be the best quality shot of "11" we have seen. So much so that I reckon we can all see that for the amount of port wing shown in this clip [cast in shadow] that there should be more starboard wing showing. What there is of this wing seems to be pointing upward. What is it about these starboard wings, one doesn't show, one disappears and another doesn't leave a impact where it hit on the Pentagon. The starboard wing is the right wing, isn't. Is THIS a code?
----- Original Message -----From: Rosalee GrableSent: Wednesday, February 08, 2006 5:06 PMSubject: Re: SV: [Fwd: [911InsideJobbers] Re: Controlled Demolition Limited Hangout?]So where in the fark were you while I was getting beat up from all
directions all alone.
It was more than a year before anybody spoke up for me.
I am effective in internet debate format but the effort to recast my
long slog from there to here into useful essay makes me need a nap.
I have the video skills now to make a DVD.
the videos at
http://thewebfairy.com/911/missilegate/video.htm
It feels like baling the ocean with a teaspoon tho.
I have learned that videos are unmixed into "elemental streams". These
elemental streams seem to encode more information than can be expressed
in the low resolution pixel grid.
I have no other explanation for why the first hit object(s) make such
detailed beautyshots while equal enlargement of the Pentagon Art Frames
reveals flat blobs.
http://thewebfairy.com/911/flyingpig/beautyshots.htm
vs.
http://thewebfairy.com/911/pentagon/frames/startribune/st5_detail.jpg
On this detail it's particularly evident how the Art Frame has been
stretched horizontally.
perpetualynquisitive wrote:
> I was in near shock watching the events that morning, the replay of
> the 'plane' hitting WTC 2 over and over and over and over and, well
> you get the idea.
>
> It was after seeing the Fairbanks interview (Diane Sawyer) and his
> clip of the plane, when he said "it disappeared like a bad special
> effect" that caused the light bulb in my head to start blinking
> "Bingo, IT was a bad special effect!" For when they showed it slow
> motion, the plane did not react when it impacted the building, it just
> slipped right into it, like a hand into a glove.
>
> I also had a strong feeling of deja vu on 9/11, I was sure that I had
> seen the WTC heavily damaged before by a big explosion that left a big
> hole in the building. (it was in early 2002 that I verified that I had
> indeed seen the WTC in that condition when I picked up "Armageddon" on
> DVD)
>
> In the summer of 2002 I was watching The Simpsons one evening and low
> behold the episode Sideshow Bob's Last Gleaming comes on. After I
> heard Homer say "Let's Roll", while chasing a hijacked airplane, which
> escapes a failed military intercept and then crashes into a building,
> almost died as I had just had a discussion about the supposed failure
> to intercept with someone the day before and had told him it was
> red-herring disinformation to reinforce the 'plane' hoax.
>
> He is of the thinking that there must have been a miscommunication
> with NORAD at best or the military was told to look the other way,
> such as the case in Pearl Harbour at the very worst.
>
> This person is a total military buff, from the war of independence to
> the present and can name almost every major military/battle statistic,
> weapon platform, personnel, tactics etc, and he just couldn't
> understand how the hijacked planes could fly around as long as they
> did without getting shot out of the sky.
>
> As I explaned (hehe) to him, no planes = no airforce failure = no
> standdown = no reprimands for military personnel.
>
> --- In 911InsideJobbers@yahoogroups.com, Rosalee Grable <webfairy@...>
> wrote:
>
>> You beat me to figuring out No Planes.
>> I was intrigued by the Where's The Boeing site, back when I first heard
>> of it, March 2002.
>> I started looking at videos and noticed the plane was missing from the
>> first hit right off.
>> I thought we would have the crime solved by summer.
>> I remember getting drunk to celebrate, and to get used to the notion
>> they used indescribables, not a plane at all.
>> There would have been no celebration if I'd been able to guess that
>> people would be barely catching on in 2006, with economic crash and
>> synthetic terror hard on our heels.
>> People that stupid deserve to be slaves, is the only answer I've
>>
> come up
>
>> with.
>>
>>
>>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>>> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>>>
>>> * Visit your group "911InsideJobbers
>>> <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/911InsideJobbers>" on the web.
>>>
>>> * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>>> 911InsideJobbers-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>>>
>>>
> <mailto:911InsideJobbers-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>
>
>>>
>>> * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
>>> Service <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
SPONSORED LINKS
Government procurement Government leasing Government grants for women Government lease Government contract Government money
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
- Visit your group "911InsideJobbers" on the web.
- To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
911InsideJobbers-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
No comments:
Post a Comment