1) I don't know what to make of Greene; I guess I would personally ignore
him. I tend to agree with what he says about Hufschmid. Hufschmid has
weird/extreme political views, and the holocaust denial thing is disturbing
(personally I try to avoid the holocaust issue). I tend to avoid Hufschmid
myself.
2) I'm not sure what you want to do with your blog; what do you want to
accomplish with it? Do you get a lot of hits? If you really are the second hit on
google for 9/11/01, and that pulls in a lot of people, then I would put
reorganize your blog to highlight more 9/11 issues, key articles, like you have
at the bottom. Try to sell people on 9/11 more. Visually, the blog was
confusing, somewhat random, and not particularly attractive. If you want to
attract "newbies", you might redesign the layout some. The posts as you have
them set-up are probably a turn-off for a newcomer. Moreover, most of the
posts are not particularly compelling. There seems to be too much random
stuff. I'm not sure if you just want to catalogue a lot of articles or if you want
comments from visitors; your personal commentary seems minimal. Also, I
couldn't see how to access your archives. Sorry if this is harsh; this is merely
my opinion, meant to be helpful...
--- In 911InsideJobbers@yahoogroups.com, Bill Giltner <bill.giltner@...>
wrote:
>
> Thanks for responding.
>
> Since Greene was new to me, and the fact that he wrote what I thought
> was, on the whole, a dispicable article (what out who your friends
> are), I wanted to do two things:
>
> 1) Submit the piece to 911InsideJobbers for comment, and possibly
> more info about what a slimeball Greene is.
>
> 2) Get feedback on whether my blog, which I'm moving more and more
> toward putting in "Carnavore" mode, is structured to do any good. The
> feature that I believe in so strongly is getting an enormous amount of
> content, to be used to bring searchers in. What I do with the
> eyes/bodies once I get them here, is to be determined.....
>
>
>
> On 2/8/06, alexldent <alexldent@...> wrote:
> > What Rosalee said.
> >
> > In any case, I'm not sure at all what you want here.
> >
> > Greene's essays are a strange mixture of good points and outright
mistakes/
> > misconceptions. That is, some of his critiques are dead-on, some are
> > completely wrong IMO and others are just sneering negativity.
> >
> > I guess the strange thing is how sure Greene is that 9/11 was some covert
> > operation by the USG, yet he rejects almost all physical evidence. He
seems
> > to have the same outlook as Hoffman, not too surprisingly.
> >
> > So what is the point?
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In 911InsideJobbers@yahoogroups.com, Rosalee Grable <
webfairy@>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > So why are you repeating all the bilker claptrap nearly in full on your
> > > site?
> > > Are you agreeing with all the name calling against Meyssan?
> > >
> > > Who are you quoting?
> > > "My view is that the entire discussion of what hit the Pentagon is a tar
> > > baby designed to trap the 911 truth community in useless speculation."
> > > Is this your belief?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Bill Giltner wrote:
> > > > Check out my blog post here:
> > > >
> > > > http://bgtruth.blogspot.com/2006/02/we-believe-that-senior-
> > government.html
> > > >
> > > > Here's my main point:
> > > >
> > > > Additional Commentary by this Blogger:
> > > >
> > > > Where Dr. Green goes horribly wrong: (is this on purpose?)
> > > >
> > > > "To put matters plainly: any substitute plane would be an exact
duplicate
> > of
> > > > AA11 or UA175. To do anything else would be inviting disaster. "
> > > >
> > > > http://911research.wtc7.net/essays/green/loose_change.html
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/911InsideJobbers/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
911InsideJobbers-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
No comments:
Post a Comment