I understand.
By the way, how do you get a movie to work in Blogger? Is there a
special program to use or do you have the movie in the right format?
Appreciate any tips.
--- In 911InsideJobbers@yahoogroups.com, Bill Giltner
<bill.giltner@...> wrote:
>
> Also, there is no way I want a lot of comments. I have no additonal
> time to try to monitor comments and make sense of them, much less
> address them.
>
> My purpose is to be a conduit to some site that is not a blog. For
> reasons I think you'll agreed with, I'm not sure I want to point
> everyone to reopen911.org. Nor do I think trying to send everyone to,
> for example, webfairy.org is the right move either.
>
> I don't claim my traffic is that high, but I believe they often arrive
> on my site after doing google searches on many of a variety of 9/11
> details......
>
> On 2/8/06, Bill Giltner <bill.giltner@...> wrote:
> > Yes, it really is the 2nd hit on a google search of 09/11/2001
> > I've worked for 2+ years to make this happen.
> > Thanks for your help/thoughts.....
> >
> > On 2/8/06, alexldent <alexldent@...> wrote:
> > > 1) I don't know what to make of Greene; I guess I would
personally ignore
> > > him. I tend to agree with what he says about Hufschmid.
Hufschmid has
> > > weird/extreme political views, and the holocaust denial thing is
disturbing
> > > (personally I try to avoid the holocaust issue). I tend to
avoid Hufschmid
> > > myself.
> > >
> > > 2) I'm not sure what you want to do with your blog; what do you
want to
> > > accomplish with it? Do you get a lot of hits? If you really
are the second hit on
> > > google for 9/11/01, and that pulls in a lot of people, then I
would put
> > > reorganize your blog to highlight more 9/11 issues, key
articles, like you have
> > > at the bottom. Try to sell people on 9/11 more. Visually, the
blog was
> > > confusing, somewhat random, and not particularly attractive. If
you want to
> > > attract "newbies", you might redesign the layout some. The
posts as you have
> > > them set-up are probably a turn-off for a newcomer. Moreover,
most of the
> > > posts are not particularly compelling. There seems to be too
much random
> > > stuff. I'm not sure if you just want to catalogue a lot of
articles or if you want
> > > comments from visitors; your personal commentary seems minimal.
Also, I
> > > couldn't see how to access your archives. Sorry if this is
harsh; this is merely
> > > my opinion, meant to be helpful...
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In 911InsideJobbers@yahoogroups.com, Bill Giltner
<bill.giltner@>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for responding.
> > > >
> > > > Since Greene was new to me, and the fact that he wrote what I
thought
> > > > was, on the whole, a dispicable article (what out who your friends
> > > > are), I wanted to do two things:
> > > >
> > > > 1) Submit the piece to 911InsideJobbers for comment, and possibly
> > > > more info about what a slimeball Greene is.
> > > >
> > > > 2) Get feedback on whether my blog, which I'm moving more and
more
> > > > toward putting in "Carnavore" mode, is structured to do any
good. The
> > > > feature that I believe in so strongly is getting an enormous
amount of
> > > > content, to be used to bring searchers in. What I do with the
> > > > eyes/bodies once I get them here, is to be determined.....
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 2/8/06, alexldent <alexldent@> wrote:
> > > > > What Rosalee said.
> > > > >
> > > > > In any case, I'm not sure at all what you want here.
> > > > >
> > > > > Greene's essays are a strange mixture of good points and
outright
> > > mistakes/
> > > > > misconceptions. That is, some of his critiques are dead-on,
some are
> > > > > completely wrong IMO and others are just sneering negativity.
> > > > >
> > > > > I guess the strange thing is how sure Greene is that 9/11
was some covert
> > > > > operation by the USG, yet he rejects almost all physical
evidence. He
> > > seems
> > > > > to have the same outlook as Hoffman, not too surprisingly.
> > > > >
> > > > > So what is the point?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In 911InsideJobbers@yahoogroups.com, Rosalee Grable <
> > > webfairy@>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > So why are you repeating all the bilker claptrap nearly in
full on your
> > > > > > site?
> > > > > > Are you agreeing with all the name calling against Meyssan?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Who are you quoting?
> > > > > > "My view is that the entire discussion of what hit the
Pentagon is a tar
> > > > > > baby designed to trap the 911 truth community in useless
speculation."
> > > > > > Is this your belief?
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Bill Giltner wrote:
> > > > > > > Check out my blog post here:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > http://bgtruth.blogspot.com/2006/02/we-believe-that-senior-
> > > > > government.html
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Here's my main point:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Additional Commentary by this Blogger:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Where Dr. Green goes horribly wrong: (is this on purpose?)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > "To put matters plainly: any substitute plane would be
an exact
> > > duplicate
> > > > > of
> > > > > > > AA11 or UA175. To do anything else would be inviting
disaster. "
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > http://911research.wtc7.net/essays/green/loose_change.html
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/911InsideJobbers/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
911InsideJobbers-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
No comments:
Post a Comment