Thursday, February 09, 2006

Re: [911InsideJobbers] Request for Critique from Group: Blog Post about Michael B. Green

Your link doesn't work.
Unfortunately the other one does.
Interesting statement because if two real 767's or substitutes were in the plan then "11" would have been a scheduled flight. And so would "77". Or both flights would have been reported to be private charters.
 
Something flew into the north tower and to hastily cover up what it was flight "11" was used.
 
I've never been convinced of an inside job although I have an open mind. So far there is enough to support a hasty cover up. The Pentagon attack being the most speedily concocted one, I believe. Although 93 is running a close second. 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2006 7:19 PM
Subject: [911InsideJobbers] Request for Critique from Group: Blog Post about Michael B. Green

Check out my blog post here:

http://bgtruth.blogspot.com/2006/02/we-believe-that-senior-government.HTML

Here's my main point:

Additional Commentary by this Blogger:

Where Dr. Green goes horribly wrong: (is this on purpose?)

"To put matters plainly: any substitute plane would be an exact duplicate of
AA11 or UA175. To do anything else would be inviting disaster. "

http://911research.wtc7.net/essays/green/loose_change.html

SPONSORED LINKS
Government procurement Government leasing Government grants for women
Government lease Government contract Government money

YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



Posted by at

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)