Re: [911InsideJobbers] Is this a setup to get rid of Cheney?

As soon as you see the "VS" sign you can know it's a phoney setup
dichotomy, no more real than Saturday Night Wrestling.
(which by coincidence or not named itself NWO a few years back!)

> This really is an open question that I'm asking: what is the end game
> with our movement? If we tried to be specific (say for instance: end
> capitalism v. keep capitalism) would our ranks splinter into a million
> pieces?
So this sounds niave to me.
It would be hard to split into smaller pieces than we have so far, but
people who choose between right wing tyranny "vs" left wing tyranny
instead of no tyranny at all certainly belong on the opposite side from me.

Bill Giltner wrote:
> My Point: Although I realize Rice would be a convenient person to
> occupy the Presidency, I think the variety of actions, manipulations,
> and motives need to be watched for more subtle shadings.
>
> I don't want to "come up" like I'm a sage about this stuff. Based on
> the last week, I've got a huge amount of respect for Nico and others
> here. And, I certainly don't know the answer to: Is this a setup to
> get rid of Cheney?
>
> I've had my theories about what is going on behind the scenes. When
> Katrina happened, and Brownie was the fall guy, and Bush was looking /
> acting stupid at every turn, I thought to myself: "This is all a
> setup for Bush to go away... via a "terrorist assassination" or
> impeachment, or resignation...?"
>
> Well, a few months pass, and with Bush's State of the Union speech, he
> seems to be doing not so bad at reading Karen Hughes' words.
>
> So where does this leave us? Are we going to attack Iran, Syria,
> Jordan? Is Tony Blair going to fall. Was the timing of the release
> of the Brit. video of Iraq teenage boy abuse to whip up (even
> more) the whole Muslim riot story. (This last one does seem to be a
> no-brainer.)
>
> My thought is this: there are people who are looking at the world for
> strategic potentials, meaning having objectives and ways to accomplish
> them. At any given time, these objectives are being developed by
> creating an environment where public opinion and sentiment will allow
> the plans to be accomplished without much resistance. As an example,
> I don't really think we want to attack Iran (or will in the next 10
> years), but hyping the situation totally manipulates the public, and
> creating the environment for more Fascism.
>
> As far as how many major factions there are behind the manipulation, I
> claim no insight. Looking at 9/11, there can be no doubt that the
> media is a willing participate in lies and distraction. In addition,
> the Internet is of course filled with forces of deception, in addition
> to being a way for getting out the truth.
>
> So, my bottom line is that even if Bush and Cheney were impeached (and
> convicted) tomorrow, even if the majority of the electorate knew that
> 9/11 was an inside job, and immediate elections were held to replace
> the entire American govt were held this Summer, would that really
> change anything?
>
> This really is an open question that I'm asking: what is the end game
> with our movement? If we tried to be specific (say for instance: end
> capitalism v. keep capitalism) would our ranks splinter into a million
> pieces?
>
> On 2/15/06, *Total Information* <totalinfo@gmail.com
> <mailto:totalinfo@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> If they force out Cheney, Bush could nominate Rice as VP. That
> would likely put Rice on the fast-track to the GOP nomination in
> 08. The only way Hillary CLinton could possibly win would be
> against a black woman.... (even with Diebold)
>

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/911InsideJobbers/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
911InsideJobbers-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/