Re: SV: [Fwd: [911InsideJobbers] Re: Controlled Demolition Limited Hangout?]

My response to having words stolen out from under me, orwellized and
snuck back in meaning the opposite, was to invent my own language.

Whatzit is a word I'm so sick of my now I could scream, but I didn't
know that UAVs existed or their name, let alone that they could fly in a
close formation.
I needed a word that was NOT "UFO" cos I still think they're gonna try
to treat 911 as an "alien attack" once they get ready to trot out their
Ultimate Enemy.

Whatzits are terrestrial secret stuff of multiple sorts.
Schnookiedupes or Schnookies are people who don't believe in Secret
Stuff and would rather think planes can violate natural law and be
"real" as long as they imagine them "clearly."
Believing the contents of one's imagination to be "reality" used to be
what insanity was about.
Butterplanes were the seriously posited explanation by a Learned
Professor for why the pentagon 'plane' fitted the little hole and didn't
shed debris. It melted.

alexldent wrote:
> I like "butterplane" myself. But I would use it towards the end of
> any presentation after fully introducing the concept. *show video
> again in slow motion* --"this is why we derisively call it the
> 'butterplane'"
>
> --- In 911InsideJobbers@yahoogroups.com, "Nico Haupt" <nicohaupt@...>
> wrote:
>
>>> --- Ursprüngliche Nachricht ---
>>> Von: Peter Kofod <slashkofod@...>
>>> An: 911InsideJobbers@yahoogroups.com
>>> Betreff: SV: [Fwd: [911InsideJobbers] Re: Controlled Demolition
>>>
> Limited
>
>>> Hangout?]
>>> Datum: Tue, 7 Feb 2006 16:04:38 +0100 (CET)
>>>
>> A wording can be synched in time for a presentation,
>> but i don't know why butterplane sounds that silly?
>> This is the decade of hiphop, reality tv and geek speak.
>> No worry about strange words, puhleese....
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> I agree with alex here.
>>> To just step in front of a camera and say "no plane hit the towers"
>>> would be idiotic. But if someone would care to present an
>>>
> hardhitting and
>
>>> easy-to-understand overview of the argument, it would be a totally
>>>
>> different
>>
>>> case.
>>>
>>> Personally I would avoid terms like butterplanes and whatitz,
>>>
> since my
>
>>> PERSONAL experience is, that these terms make people NOT want to
>>>
> look at
>
>> the
>>
>>> evidence, just like screaming IDIOT at someone, probably isn´t the
>>>
> best
>
>>> way to make them consider your point, but I guess this is a matter of
>>>
>> taste?
>>
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> Peter Kofod, Denmark
>>>
>>> alexldent <alexldent@...> skrev:
>>> Obviously I'm not Rosalee, and you asked her-- but, I wouldn't
>>>
> mind if
>
>>> he did this and backed it up with a proper analysis. If you just SAY
>>> that "there was no plane crash and that the planes hitting the towers
>>> were faked" of course it sounds crazy. But if one presented it
>>> properly, I think it could be a very effective argument. The more I
>>> look at these pictures of the WTC and the planes and then the
>>> plane-shaped holes, the more bogus it looks.
>>>
>>> The truth is the truth, and I don't like the idea of hiding the truth,
>>> no matter how crazy it might initially sound.
>>>
>>>
>>>> Do you really want Professor Jones to
>>>> go on national TV and say that there was no plane crash and that
>>>>
> the
>
>>>> planes hitting the towers were faked and edited in later on
>>>> videotape? What praytell would be the result of him taking that
>>>> action? What good would it do our truth movement if people of
>>>>
> Jones
>
>>>> stature started doing things like that?
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> SPONSORED LINKS
>>> Government procurement Government leasing Government
>>>
> grants
>
>>> for women Government lease Government contract Government
>>>
> money
>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------
>>> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>>>
>>>
>>> Visit your group "911InsideJobbers" on the web.
>>>
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>>> 911InsideJobbers-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>>>
>>> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
>>>
> Service.
>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> --
>> 10 GB Mailbox, 100 FreeSMS/Monat http://www.gmx.net/de/go/topmail
>> +++ GMX - die erste Adresse für Mail, Message, More +++
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/911InsideJobbers/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
911InsideJobbers-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/