Re: SV: [Fwd: [911InsideJobbers] Re: Controlled Demolition Limited Hangout?]

> --- Ursprüngliche Nachricht ---
> Von: "perpetualynquisitive" <perpetualynquisitive@yahoo.com>
> An: 911InsideJobbers@yahoogroups.com
> Betreff: SV: [Fwd: [911InsideJobbers] Re: Controlled Demolition Limited
> Hangout?]
> Datum: Wed, 08 Feb 2006 06:46:30 -0000

Perpetual,

glad to have you here, as also for your intense (non off-topic) inputs on
our forum at team8plus, though we focus more on the flights than the
'planes'
I'm curious to see your final presentation :)

btw, did you ever appear as "aau175ua93planes" or knows, what happened with
him???

> --- In 911InsideJobbers@yahoogroups.com, Peter Kofod <slashkofod@...>
> wrote:
> >
> > I agree with alex here.
> > To just step in front of a camera and say "no planehit the towers"
> would be idiotic. But if someone would care to presentan hardhitting and
> easy-to-understand overview of the argument, itwould be a totally
> different case.
> >
> > Personally I would avoid terms like butterplanes andwhatitz, since
> my PERSONAL experience is, that these terms make peopleNOT want to look
> at the evidence, just like screaming IDIOT at someone,probably isn´t
> the best way to make them consider your point, but Iguess this is a
> matter of taste?
> >
> > Best,
> > Peter Kofod, Denmark
> >
> > alexldent <alexldent@...> skrev:
> > Obviously I'm not Rosalee, and you asked her-- but, I wouldn't mind
> if
> > he did this and backed it up with a proper analysis. If you just SAY
> > that "there was no plane crash and that the planes hitting the towers
> > were faked" of course it sounds crazy. But if one presented it
> > properly, I think it could be a very effective argument. The more I
> > look at these pictures of the WTC and the planes and then the
> > plane-shaped holes, the more bogus it looks.
> >
> > The truth is the truth, and I don't like the idea of hiding the truth,
> > no matter how crazy it might initially sound.
> >
> > > Do you really want Professor Jones to
> > > go on national TV and say that there was no plane crash and that the
> > > planes hitting the towers were faked and edited in later on
> > > videotape? What praytell would be the result of him taking that
> > > action? What good would it do our truth movement if people of Jones
> > > stature started doing things like that?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > SPONSORED LINKS
> > Governmentprocurement Government leasing Governmentgrants
> for women Government lease Government contract Government money
> >
> > ---------------------------------
> > YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
> >
> >
> > Visit your group "911InsideJobbers" on the web.
> >
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > 911InsideJobbers-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
> Service.
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------
> >
> We may have such a presentation available soon. I have been working ona
> 9/11 presentation, for more than 2 years, that exclusively covers
> theno-plane "theory". Thus far I have been able to show parts of it to
> people that were believers of the Official Fairy Tale and to date NOT
> one person that I went over the material with disagreed with my
> perspective afterwards. 100% conversion rate. Keep in mind this was done
> on a one-on-one basis with people that know me, but the results are
> encouraging.
>
> In the coming weeks (hopefully by April) I will make the
> presentationavailable for others to review, debunk, toss out the window,
> etc.
>
> For now, I will give you the title of the presentation:
>
> 9/11:
> Collusion
> Illusion
> Delusion.
>
> Collusion is the planning of 9/11 (including memes for alternative
> scenarios).
> Illusion is the actual attack and coverage.
> Delusion is the inability of the public to see through the deception.
>
>
> FWIW, back in December 2001, I aired my perspective about no-planes to
> several friends, it sailed about as smooth as the Titanic. Many of those
> people would not even speak to me for several months afterwards,a couple
> still won't (and refuse to hear my presentation as well), but the rest
> have since become convinced that the no-plane perspective is closer to
> what really occurred that morning than any other analysis.
>
>
>

--
Lust, ein paar Euro nebenbei zu verdienen? Ohne Kosten, ohne Risiko!
Satte Provisionen für GMX Partner: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/partner

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/911InsideJobbers/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
911InsideJobbers-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/