noname@noname.com recommends this article from The Christian Science Monitor
======================= ADVERTISEMENT ==============================
Sign up for the Monitor Treeless Edition!
http://www.csmonitortreeless.com?dmc=E35W191
====================================================================
Click here to read this story online:
http://www.csmonitor.com/2006/0203/p01s01-usec.html
Headline: The squeeze on American pocketbooks
Byline: Mark Trumbull Staff writer of The Christian Science Monitor
Date: 02/03/2006
Americans are working as hard as ever, but their paychecks aren't
keeping pace with rising inflation. That means trouble for their
pocketbooks - and for an economy that's fueled by their spending.
Indeed, after two years of a "jobless recovery" following the 2001
recession, the US economy now faces something equally unsettling: a
"wageless recovery."
Several government reports this week tell the story. For the first year
since the Great Depression, the personal savings rate went negative in
2005. Pay and benefits, meanwhile, rose just 3.1 percent last year -
the lowest rate since 1996 and not enough to outpace a 3.4 percent jump
in the consumer price index. Is there any relief in sight?
None came Thursday, as the government reported a decline in worker
productivity for the closing months of last year, a trend that could
limit future wage growth.
The outlook isn't all discouraging, but a four-year-old economic
expansion is clearly struggling to maintain its momentum. The reason:
Americans are being squeezed from both sides of the household ledger.
On the income side, wage growth has been historically low for a period
of economic recovery. On the spending side, energy prices and interest
rates are higher.
Meanwhile, home-equity loans are no longer an easy way out. Soaring
property values that turned many houses into two-story ATM machines
appear to be flattening out or even falling.
"If the housing market softens ... American consumers will then have
little choice other than to bring spending and saving back into more
prudent alignment with income," said Stephen Roach, a Morgan Stanley
economist, in a recent analysis. "The combination of a relatively
jobless and wageless recovery puts tremendous pressure on American
households."
Economists aren't expecting a recession. But since consumers account
for more than two-thirds of the nation's economic output, the health of
American wage earners is a central question mark hanging over this
year's economy.
Other parts of the economy may help pick up the slack. With the world
economy expanding, exports should contribute solidly to gross domestic
product (GDP). And many economists expect to see businesses invest more
of their record profits in new equipment and facilities. That, in turn,
could mean more jobs and paychecks. Forecasters generally expect strong
economic growth in the first few months of this year, after hurricanes
and slower consumer spending dragged down GDP growth to a 1 percent
annual pace for the last three months of 2005.
Indeed, the Federal Reserve remains more concerned about possible
inflationary pressures than about economic growth falling below a
normal pace of about 3 percent. Earlier this week, the Fed moved to
constrain those pressures for the 14th time since June 2004, bringing
its short-term interest rate to 4.5 percent. Another rate hike is
considered likely in March.
Thursday's productivity report did little to assuage concerns about
inflation. For years, unexpectedly strong gains in output per hour - a
productivity bonus - helped the economy grow without upward pressure on
prices.
By becoming more efficient, companies have more cash flowing to their
bottom line. Productivity can accelerate economic growth and raise
living standards. In the current expansion, it has created record
corporate profits. But a lower than normal amount has gone into pay
raises. And now, the pace of improving efficiency appears to be slowing
down, at least temporarily.
The productivity rate actually fell for the fourth quarter of 2005.
Meanwhile, the cost of labor per unit of output rose by 2.4 percent for
the year, up from 1.1 percent in 2004.
Fed policymakers could take that as a sign of inflationary wage
pressures starting to build. They would rather see wage hikes matched
by productivity gains.
Ken Goldstein, an economist at the Conference Board, a business
research group based in New York, sees the current trend as a pullback
of productivity to a more typical pace.
"We can't be above average all the time," he says. But the slower
productivity growth means it will be hard for wages to rise this year
faster than inflation.
"Somebody's going to get squeezed here in 2006," Goldstein says,
referring to workers and businesses. "It's possible they could both be
squeezed."
Not everyone in the economy is feeling that pinch. Many sectors are
expanding.
"Things are starting to pick up," says Andrew Van Tassle, who works at
Message Level, high-tech firm in Boston that provides e-mail security.
He says he hopes to see a pay raise this year, as the start-up wins
more customers.
After a slow patch in 2002 and 2003, the economy is creating about 2
million jobs a year. Meanwhile, global competition seems to be holding
a lid on wages. Even as the unemployment rate has fallen to 4.9
percent, salary hikes haven't been as robust as in tight labor markets
of the past.
Along with rising energy prices, these factors help explain why
America's personal savings totalled negative 0.5 percent of income last
year. It's a sign of thinner wallets, but it doesn't necessarily mean
that Americans have stopped funding their 401(k) plans.
The rate compares broad measures of disposable income and spending. But
on the income side, it fails to factor in pensions and capital gains.
When those are included, says economist Ed Yardeni of Oak Associates,
an investment firm in Akron, Ohio, the idea that Americans are living
beyond their means is "more of a forecast than it is a reality."
According to Federal Reserve data, American households had a total net
worth of about $51 trillion as of last fall. That's up from $40.7
trillion in 2001. The median family net worth - assets minus
liabilities - has risen from $61,300 in 1992 to $86,100 in 2001.
(c) Copyright 2006 The Christian Science Monitor. All rights reserved.
Click here to email this story to a friend:
http://www.csmonitor.com/cgi-bin/send-story?2006/0203/p01s01-usec.txt
The Christian Science Monitor-- an independent daily newspaper providing context and clarity on national and international news, peoples and cultures, and social trends. Online at http://www.csmonitor.com
Click here to order a free sample copy of the print edition of the Monitor:
http://www.csmonitor.com/aboutus/sample_issue.html
======================= ADVERTISEMENT ==============================
Sign up to have the Monitor's headlines sent directly to your inbox.
http://www.csmonitor.com/email
====================================================================
No comments:
Post a Comment