Compare this planes' position in relation to the camera angle/towers positions with the one at the terrorize site called the "Woolworth Missile" and I'd say they were insulting our intelligence. We shouldn't even be seeing this one and at this angle of approach.
----- Original Message -----From: Rosalee GrableSent: Wednesday, February 15, 2006 5:04 PMSubject: Notice the Mottling. Re: [911InsideJobbers] Re: Several new videos of second hit on Terrorize-- are all fake?
http://img520.imageshack.us/img520/9979/newyork110mr.jpg
This one is an obviously farked with.
The mottling effect applied to the background while the plane and the
whatzit are crystal clear just screams fake.
The whatzit and the plane being so "clear" while the background is
mottled for blurryness shows that they are getting willing to work
whatzits into the storyline.
This is a still, not a video.
When video starts showing high resolution, this is FAKE.
Video is low resolution, but makes up for this by progressing through time.
High resolution is high resolution. Blurry is blurry. Mottled is
mottled. The mixture of mottled and clear shows faked.
On the picture of the whatzit notice the traces of gray from the
original backtround.
alexldent wrote:
> I understand. Video manipulation is probably a much better term than
> fake.
>
> --- In 911InsideJobbers@yahoogroups.com, "Nico Haupt" <nicohaupt@...>
> wrote:
>
>>> --- Ursprüngliche Nachricht ---
>>> Von: "Rob" <robertjcash@...>
>>> An: 911InsideJobbers@yahoogroups.com
>>> Betreff: [911InsideJobbers] Re: Several new videos of second hit on
>>> Terrorize-- are all fake?
>>> Datum: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 03:19:29 -0000
>>>
>>>
>> be careful. Using the word "fake" is confusing the issue.
>> If rendered productions are used, they're as 'real' as the broadcast.
>>
>> It's about media deception we're generally talking.
>> They used bluescreen tech for this deception, this is a 'real process'.
>>
>> joe six pack-no planer would use occasionally use
>> the word fakery (what we're also doing among us), but if we are precise:
>> only his view of the reality was faked-manipulated instead.
>>
>> Or better they used a replacement of the reality.
>>
>>
>> 2nd step, this email here:
>> If a product is re-altered after the fact, it's like debating about
>>
> a remix
>
>> of a cover-version of a dance tune.
>>
>> i know that word debating sounds like harrassment, but that is
>>
> exactly what
>
>> can be used against this research.
>>
>> Staging is not faking, and remodelling a "fake" (slang) doesn't make the
>> original less fake (slang), but an original, first product.
>>
>>
>> If i'm sounding too bizarre, please help out with the better
>>
> language :)
>
>>
>>
>>>>>> Orbs. Sorta like these wierd little thingys...
>>>>>>
>> http://img520.imageshack.us/img520/9979/newyork110mr.jpg
>>
>> http://img492.imageshack.us/img492/6104/s6my.jpg<<<
>>
>> --
>> DSL-Aktion wegen großer Nachfrage bis 28.2.2006 verlängert:
>> GMX DSL-Flatrate 1 Jahr kostenlos* http://www.gmx.net/de/go/dsl
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
SPONSORED LINKS
Government procurement Government leasing Government grants for women Government lease Government contract Government money
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
- Visit your group "911InsideJobbers" on the web.
- To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
911InsideJobbers-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
No comments:
Post a Comment