Discussion about 09/11/2001: [911TruthAction] Digest Number 1309

Monday, May 29, 2006

[911TruthAction] Digest Number 1309

------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~-->
Protect your PC from spy ware with award winning anti spy technology. It's free.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/97bhrC/LGxNAA/yQLSAA/KSwplB/TM--------------------------------------------------------------------~->

There are 25 messages in this issue.

Topics in this digest:

1. "5 Israelis detained for`puzzling behavior' after WTC tragedy" (Haar
From: "jewish_from_brooklyn" jewish_from_brooklyn@yahoo.com
2. "Pre-9/11 World Trade Center Power-Down"
From: "jewish_from_brooklyn" jewish_from_brooklyn@yahoo.com
3. "5 Israelis detained for`puzzling behavior' after WTC tragedy" (Haar
From: "jewish_from_brooklyn" jewish_from_brooklyn@yahoo.com
4. "Pre-9/11 World Trade Center Power-Down"
From: "jewish_from_brooklyn" jewish_from_brooklyn@yahoo.com
5. Well oh my golly my GOSH!
From: "Kevin Lee Hammond" exposethenewworldorder@yahoo.com
6. Re: Well oh my golly my GOSH!
From: "Jamie Welsh" jamie@xenic.com
7. Re: Well oh my golly my GOSH!
From: "Kevin Hammond" sir_oglaigh@yahoo.com
8. if you have a moment - re: 9/11 as inside job
From: "Cathy Garger" savorsuccesslady@yahoo.com
9. A Day in the Life: 5/28/6
From: "President, USA Exile Govt." prez@usa-exile.org
10. Fw: NYT (1993): FBI allowed the WTC bombing to happen
From: "Ronald" bleier.r@gmail.com
11. Re: Well oh my golly my GOSH!
From: "DOUGLAS CLARK" bushsept11mastermind@yahoo.com
12. Re: Well oh my golly my GOSH!
From: "Jarrett Smith" Jarret.Smith@ntlworld.com
13. Re: Don't post Nazi garbage to this list! -was Great New Racial Blog
From: "Jarrett Smith" Jarret.Smith@ntlworld.com
14. [Underling Incarcerated in our own gloomy grey cells
From: "Edward Pickersgill" edward@mytown.ca
15. Iran Militias Gain Foothold in Iraq laying ground for Reg.Government
From: "ranger116@webtv.net" ranger116@webtv.net
16. Re: Great New Racial Blogs!
From: "jewish_from_brooklyn" jewish_from_brooklyn@yahoo.com
17. Killing Arabs and burning down their cities
From: "jewish_from_brooklyn" jewish_from_brooklyn@yahoo.com
18. Re: Fw: NYT (1993): FBI allowed the WTC bombing to happen
From: "Naveed" flanker12k@yahoo.com
19. Re: Well oh my golly my GOSH!
From: "Naveed" flanker12k@yahoo.com
20. Required Reading
From: "Joe Stokes" joestokes@sbcglobal.net
21. http://www.radicalruss.net/bushmap/200605.php
From: "Joe Stokes" joestokes@sbcglobal.net
22. Re: Well oh my golly my GOSH!
From: "Kevin Hammond" sir_oglaigh@yahoo.com
23. Re: Fw: NYT (1993): FBI allowed the WTC bombing to happen
From: "Kevin Hammond" sir_oglaigh@yahoo.com
24. Re: Killing Arabs and burning down their cities
From: "Kevin Hammond" sir_oglaigh@yahoo.com
25. Re: Well oh my golly my GOSH!
From: "Kevin Hammond" sir_oglaigh@yahoo.com

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 1
From: "jewish_from_brooklyn" jewish_from_brooklyn@yahoo.com
Date: Sun May 28, 2006 7:42am(PDT)
Subject: "5 Israelis detained for`puzzling behavior' after WTC tragedy" (Haar

Message-ID: <e5ccpa+t4db@eGroups.com>
User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Yahoo Groups Message Poster
X-Yahoo-Post-IP: 65.70.204.59
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: groups-compose
Sender: notify@yahoogroups.com
X-Yahoo-GPoster: WvptNTZ8eQGfuo6y

http://tinyurl.com/gh3sx

http://www.haaretzdaily.com/hasen/pages/
ShArt.jhtml?itemNo=3D75266&sw=3Dmockery%20

Last update=A0-=A001:10 17/09/2001

5 Israelis detained for `puzzling behavior' after WTC tragedy

By Yossi Melman

<<< Five Israelis who had worked for a moving company based in New Jerse=
y are
being held in U.S. prisons for what the Federal Bureau of Investigation has=
described
as "puzzling behavior" following the terror attack on the World Trade Cente=
r in New
York last Tuesday. The five are expected to be deported sometime soon.

The families of the five, who asked that their names not be released, said =
that their
sons had been questioned by the FBI for hours on end, had been kept in soli=
tary
confinement for three days, and had been humiliated, stripped of their clot=
hes and
blindfolded.

The mother of one of the young men explained the chain of events as she
understands it to Ha'aretz:

She said that the five had worked for the company, which is owned by an Isr=
aeli, for
between two months and two years. They had been arrested some four hours af=
ter
the attack on the Twin Towers while filming the smoking skyline from the ro=
of of
their company's building, she said. It appears that they were spotted by on=
e of the
neighbors who called the police and the FBI.

The mother said that the families and friends of the five in Israel had kno=
wn nothing
of the men's whereabouts for a number of days.

"When they finally let my son make a phone call for the first time to a fri=
end in the
United States two days ago, he told him that he had been tortured by the FB=
I in a
basement," the mother said. "He was stripped to his underwear; he was blind=
folded
and questioned for 14 hours. They thought that because he has citizenship o=
f a
European country as well as of Israel that he was working for the Mossad [I=
srael's
secret service]."

Seven FBI agents later stormed the apartment of one of the Israelis, search=
ed it and
questioned his roommate. The Israeli owner of the company, who has U.S.
citizenship, was also questioned. Both men were subsequently released.

The families here complained that the Israeli consulate in New York and the=
situation
room set up by the Foreign Ministry there to locate missing Israelis had do=
ne nothing
to help their sons. The Foreign Ministry told the families that the FBI had=
denied
holding the five and that the consulate had chosen to believe the FBI, the =
mother said.

The five were transferred out of the FBI's facility on Saturday morning and=
are now
being held in two prisons in New Jersey by the Immigration and Naturalizati=
on
Services. They are charged with illegally residing in the United States and=
working
there without permits.

The Foreign Ministry said in response that it had been informed by the cons=
ulate in
New York that the FBI had arrested the five for "puzzling behavior." They a=
re said to
have had been caught videotaping the disaster and shouting in what was inte=
rpreted
as cries of joy and mockery. >>>

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 2
From: "jewish_from_brooklyn" jewish_from_brooklyn@yahoo.com
Date: Sun May 28, 2006 7:54am(PDT)
Subject: "Pre-9/11 World Trade Center Power-Down"

Message-ID: <e5cdi4+7dpp@eGroups.com>
User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Yahoo Groups Message Poster
X-Yahoo-Post-IP: 65.70.204.59
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: groups-compose
Sender: notify@yahoogroups.com
X-Yahoo-GPoster: ax3kYD6Lmpf0mPQo

<< "Did the World Trade Center towers undergo a deliberate 'power-down'
on the weekend prior to the 9-11 terrorist attacks? According to Scott Forb=
es,
a senior database administrator for Fiduciary Trust, Inc. =96 a high-net in=
vestment
bank which was later acquired by Franklin Templeton =96 this is precisely w=
hat
took place. Forbes, who was hired by Fiduciary in 1999 and is now stationed=

at a U.K. branch office, was working on the weekend of September 8-9, 2001,=

and said that his company was given three weeks advance notice that New Yor=
k's
Port Authority would take out power in the South Tower from the 48th floor =
up.
The reason: the Port Authority was performing a cabling upgrade to increase=
the
WTC's computer bandwidth." >>

http://la.indymedia.org/news/2004/04/108539.php

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 3
From: "jewish_from_brooklyn" jewish_from_brooklyn@yahoo.com
Date: Sun May 28, 2006 7:59am(PDT)
Subject: "5 Israelis detained for`puzzling behavior' after WTC tragedy" (Haar

http://tinyurl.com/gh3sx

http://www.haaretzdaily.com/hasen/pages/
ShArt.jhtml?itemNo=75266&sw=mockery%20

Last update - 01:10 17/09/2001

5 Israelis detained for `puzzling behavior' after WTC tragedy

By Yossi Melman

<<< Five Israelis who had worked for a moving company based in New Jersey are
being held in U.S. prisons for what the Federal Bureau of Investigation has
described
as "puzzling behavior" following the terror attack on the World Trade Center in
New
York last Tuesday. The five are expected to be deported sometime soon.

The families of the five, who asked that their names not be released, said that
their
sons had been questioned by the FBI for hours on end, had been kept in solitary
confinement for three days, and had been humiliated, stripped of their clothes
and
blindfolded.

The mother of one of the young men explained the chain of events as she
understands it to Ha'aretz:

She said that the five had worked for the company, which is owned by an Israeli,
for
between two months and two years. They had been arrested some four hours after
the attack on the Twin Towers while filming the smoking skyline from the roof of
their company's building, she said. It appears that they were spotted by one of
the
neighbors who called the police and the FBI.

The mother said that the families and friends of the five in Israel had known
nothing
of the men's whereabouts for a number of days.

"When they finally let my son make a phone call for the first time to a friend
in the
United States two days ago, he told him that he had been tortured by the FBI in
a
basement," the mother said. "He was stripped to his underwear; he was
blindfolded
and questioned for 14 hours. They thought that because he has citizenship of a
European country as well as of Israel that he was working for the Mossad
[Israel's
secret service]."

Seven FBI agents later stormed the apartment of one of the Israelis, searched it
and
questioned his roommate. The Israeli owner of the company, who has U.S.
citizenship, was also questioned. Both men were subsequently released.

The families here complained that the Israeli consulate in New York and the
situation
room set up by the Foreign Ministry there to locate missing Israelis had done
nothing
to help their sons. The Foreign Ministry told the families that the FBI had
denied
holding the five and that the consulate had chosen to believe the FBI, the
mother said.

The five were transferred out of the FBI's facility on Saturday morning and are
now
being held in two prisons in New Jersey by the Immigration and Naturalization
Services. They are charged with illegally residing in the United States and
working
there without permits.

The Foreign Ministry said in response that it had been informed by the consulate
in
New York that the FBI had arrested the five for "puzzling behavior." They are
said to
have had been caught videotaping the disaster and shouting in what was
interpreted
as cries of joy and mockery. >>>

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 4
From: "jewish_from_brooklyn" jewish_from_brooklyn@yahoo.com
Date: Sun May 28, 2006 8:02am(PDT)
Subject: "Pre-9/11 World Trade Center Power-Down"

<< "Did the World Trade Center towers undergo a deliberate 'power-down'
on the weekend prior to the 9-11 terrorist attacks? According to Scott Forbes,
a senior database administrator for Fiduciary Trust, Inc. – a high-net
investment
bank which was later acquired by Franklin Templeton – this is precisely what
took place. Forbes, who was hired by Fiduciary in 1999 and is now stationed
at a U.K. branch office, was working on the weekend of September 8-9, 2001,
and said that his company was given three weeks advance notice that New York's
Port Authority would take out power in the South Tower from the 48th floor up.
The reason: the Port Authority was performing a cabling upgrade to increase the
WTC's computer bandwidth." >>

http://la.indymedia.org/news/2004/04/108539.php

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 5
From: "Kevin Lee Hammond" exposethenewworldorder@yahoo.com
Date: Sun May 28, 2006 10:06am(PDT)
Subject: Well oh my golly my GOSH!

As I was on my way out the door from work fri eve. my boss stopped me and asked if I knew where he could get a copy of loose change! Could it be perhaps because I have given a copy to each of my co-workers and made sure that they watched it?! Could it be also, That I have woken up damn near every shop owner and worker on the block where I work?! With copies of not only Loose Change, but also of martial Law and other such dvds!. One woman in turn took them to her church and woke up her entire congregation! Please do not take this as boasting bu t as just informing you all of the fact that folks are WAKING UP!

Kevin
www.fightthenwo.org

---------------------------------
Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Make PC-to-Phone Calls to the US (and 30+ countries) for 2¢/min or less.
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 6
From: "Jamie Welsh" jamie@xenic.com
Date: Sun May 28, 2006 10:18am(PDT)
Subject: Re: Well oh my golly my GOSH!

it's ok boast away kevin! you make me proud.
-jamie

On May 28, 2006, at 10:06 AM, Kevin Lee Hammond wrote:

> As I was on my way out the door from work fri eve. my boss stopped
> me and asked if I knew where he could get a copy of loose change!
> Could it be perhaps because I have given a copy to each of my co-
> workers and made sure that they watched it?! Could it be also,
> That I have woken up damn near every shop owner and worker on the
> block where I work?! With copies of not only Loose Change, but
> also of martial Law and other such dvds!. One woman in turn took
> them to her church and woke up her entire congregation! Please do
> not take this as boasting bu t as just informing you all of the
> fact that folks are WAKING UP!
>
> Kevin
> www.fightthenwo.org
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Make PC-to-Phone Calls to the US (and
> 30+ countries) for 2¢/min or less.
>
> SPONSORED LINKS
> United state army United state grant United state government grant
> United state patent United state flag United state citizenship
>
> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
> Visit your group "911TruthAction" on the web.
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> 911TruthAction-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
>
>

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 7
From: "Kevin Hammond" sir_oglaigh@yahoo.com
Date: Sun May 28, 2006 10:24am(PDT)
Subject: Re: Well oh my golly my GOSH!

Awe geee shux!

Jamie Welsh <jamie@xenic.com> wrote: it's ok boast away kevin! you make me proud.
-jamie

On May 28, 2006, at 10:06 AM, Kevin Lee Hammond wrote:

---------------------------------
Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Make PC-to-Phone Calls to the US (and 30+ countries) for 2¢/min or less.

SPONSORED LINKS
United state army United state grant United state government grant United state patent United state flag United state citizenship

---------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

---------------------------------

SPONSORED LINKS
United state flag United state grant United state military Trademark united state United state patent United state army

---------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

---------------------------------

Saoirse go deo! www.fightthenwo.org

---------------------------------
Sneak preview the all-new Yahoo.com. It's not radically different. Just radically better.
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 8
From: "Cathy Garger" savorsuccesslady@yahoo.com
Date: Sun May 28, 2006 10:42am(PDT)
Subject: if you have a moment - re: 9/11 as inside job

I have posted my "May Day, I Repeat, May Day" Say Vets! piece on truthout in the hopes that the still un-aware liberals of America will learn that 9/11 was an inside job - and join the Veterans for 9/11 Truth in trying to get more public education out there as well as demand criminal prosecutions for the criminals (our own domestic Home-Grown evil-doing "terra-ists: who did the heinous mass murders).

The thing with the truthout blogs is that the ones with the most comments tend to attract the most attention - so even if you just have one minute to post a one or two sentence comment on the fact that you, too, believe that 9/11 was an inside job, that will certainly go a long way in getting lots of truthout blog readers to read this piece.

You will see the May Day piece on the right side of the page under Recent Diaries:
http://forum.truthout.org/blog/

Thanks so much!

Cathy Garger

If the crazies and the psy ops aren't after you, then you're barking up the wrong tree.

~ S.P. ~

---------------------------------
Love cheap thrills? Enjoy PC-to-Phone calls to 30+ countries for just 2¢/min with Yahoo! Messenger with Voice.
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 9
From: "President, USA Exile Govt." prez@usa-exile.org
Date: Sun May 28, 2006 10:49am(PDT)
Subject: A Day in the Life: 5/28/6

GOVERNMENT OF THE USA IN EXILE
Free Americans Reaching
Out to Amerika's Huddled Masses Yearning to Breathe Free

Via <prez@usa-exile.org>

May 28, 2006

----------

Iran Has the Right to Self-Defense

By Ghali Hassan
May 27, 2006

GlobalResearch.ca

"While claiming to be protecting the world from proliferation threats
in Iraq, Libya, Iran and North Korea, American leaders not only have
abandoned existing treaty restraints but also have asserted plans to
test and develop new weapons, including anti-ballistic missiles, the
earth-penetrating "bunker buster" and perhaps some new "small" bombs.
They also have abandoned past pledges and now threaten first use of
nuclear weapons against nonnuclear states." Former U.S. President,
Jimmy Carter. [1]

The U.S. and Israel are in the process of manufacturing a "crisis" to
justify a war of aggression against Iran in flagrant violations of
international law and norms. The current crisis is reminiscent to the
crisis which was manufactured to justify the illegal war of aggression
against a defenceless Iraq.

On its part, Iran poses no threat to other nations. Nor is Iran in
violation of international law and norms. Therefore, Iran has an
inalienable right to self-defence against aggression.

Contrary to media reports and distortions, Iran is not engaged in the
development of nuclear weapons and Iran is not threatening other
nations. Like many other nations, Iran is pursuing legitimate peaceful
nuclear research. Under the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT),
Iran has the right to enrich uranium for peaceful uses. There is
absolutely no evidence that Iran is pursuing a nuclear weapons program.
The accusations that Iran has "nuclear weapon ambitions" are ridiculous
at best.

Without any justification, the U.S. and Israel have threatened to
attack Iran with nuclear weapons if Iran continues its nuclear program.
Three members of the European Union, Britain, France and Germany, are
being coerced by the U.S. to act against their interests and against
the wishes of the vast majority of EU citizens.

Although Iran tried to negotiate a peaceful solution to the crisis, the
U.S. has consistently rejected Iran’s offers and showed that it is not
interested in a peaceful solution. Iran has stated publicly that it is
seeking a "security guarantee" and Iran is willing to participate in
the establishment of a nuclear-free zone in the Middle East. Instead of
pursuing peaceful dialogue, the U.S. continues to follow Israel’s
ideology of war and expansion. Israeli leaders are publicly pushing the
U.S. to attack Iran. The U.S. is acting as if the U.S. Army is Israel’s
proxy army and many young Americans are dying for Israel’s Zionist
ideology.

Israel has illegally attacked and invaded other nations. Israel is
still occupying land in Lebanon and Syria in contravention of UN
resolutions. Israel is currently arming and training Kurdish militias
in northern Iraq and the Iranian Mujahideen el-Khalq (MEK) -- until
recently listed as terrorist group by the U.S. State Department -- to
carry out clandestine terror operations and surveillance inside Iran.

The U.S. goal is to overthrow the democratically elected government of
Iran, enforce U.S. imperialist domination over the oil resources of the
Middle East and support Israel's Zionist policy. It is important to
bear in mind that during the murderous dictatorial regime of the shah,
the U.S. and Israel supported Iran in its pursuit of developing nuclear
weapons technology. The current Iranian program is a peaceful nuclear
technology to produce energy.

Furthermore, Iran is not guilty of violations of international law.
Iran has voluntarily signed the Additional Protocol. As stated by the
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) report of 8 March, "Iran has
continued to facilitate access under its Safeguards Agreement as
requested by the Agency and, until 06 February 2006, implemented the
Additional Protocol as if it were in force, including by providing, in
a timely manner, the requisite declarations and access to locations."

The Director-General of the IAEA, Mohamed ElBaradei, has pointed out
several times in the past that Iran is not in violation of the NPT or
any agreement with the IAEA. However, Mr. ElBaradei has since been
rewarded (with a Nobel Prize) by his masters and proves to be good at
following orders. ElBaradei is making misleading statements accusing
Iran of "non-compliance." As usual, the IAEA continues to politicise
the situation, forcing Iran into the impossible. The statement that the
IAEA is "unable to confirm the absence of undeclared nuclear material
and activities inside Iran" is the same misleading statement used by
Hans Blix -- the UN accomplice -- to demonise Iraq and prepare the
public for the illegal war of aggression that destroyed a vibrant
nation and killed hundreds of thousands of innocent Iraqi civilians.
Now ElBaradei's role is "to keep providing the U.S. the ammunition for
charges of 'non-compliance.’ With time, the public will be prepared and
persuaded to support a war on Iran.

Iran has stated publicly that it is willing to enter into dialogue with
the U.S. to discuss all issues, including "security guarantees" --
assurance of non-aggression -- and demanded that the U.S. and Israel
stop their threats and interference in Iran's affairs. The U.S. and its
allies are using the nuclear issue as a pretext to justify war on Iran
in the same way they used the discredited pretext of weapons of mass
destruction (WMD) for illegal war on Iraq.

The U.S. has demanded that Iran abandons all it nuclear research,
including the mining of its own uranium, and instead buy the enriched
uranium fuel for the generation of electricity. This is unacceptable as
many countries around the world do just the opposite. Like any country
would do, Iran rejected the unfair U.S. demands, which would leave Iran
dependent on outside technology and resources. On 16 May, the EU-3
demanded that Iran "suspend all enrichment related and reprocessing
activity, including research and development." Iran responded by
stating that; "No incentives are better than implementing the NPT and
the IAEA rules without discrimination." The EU-3 demands are
unrealistic and designed for propaganda purposes to enforce the case
for war. By demanding the impossible, the U.S. and the EU-3 are
increasing the possibility of conflict and aggression.

The U.S. and Israel's threat to Iran is alarming the civilised world.
In anticipation of an attack on Iran and, in addition to Israel’s own
arsenal of nuclear weapons and long-range missiles, the U.S. supplied
Israel with F-15 and F-16 aircraft capable of carrying nuclear
warheads.

Writing in the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, Avner Cohen and
William Burr show that; "A U.S. nuclear attack [on Iran] would cause
severe physical, social, economic, and political damage." Cohen and
Burr added, "Five to ten nuclear explosions of 10 kilotons each a few
meters below ground would destroy most buildings within 1-2 kilometres
of each explosion; force prompt evacuation to save lives within about a
hundred square kilometres of each explosion; contaminate buildings,
grounds, livestock, and crops over thousands of square kilometres; and
depending on wind and rain, cause fallout sufficient to cause
evacuation and/or sheltering as far as thousands of kilometres
downwind. Measurable radioactivity would be detected around the world."
[2]

Given that most of Iran’s research plants and facilities are situated
in urban areas and near population centres, hundreds of thousands of
innocent civilians would be killed. American citizens should think
carefully before their government commits new crimes against humanity
in their name.

Rather than working to eliminate the use of nuclear weapons, the U.S.
is continuing to refine its own nuclear weapons, and considers them an
integral part of its military forces. In violation of the NPT, the U.S.
is pursuing more nuclear armaments and is encouraging other nations to
develop nuclear weapons. In reality, the U.S. is in the process of
making the use of the monstrous nuclear weapons more acceptable in
future wars against nations with no nuclear weapons. We should not
forget that the U.S. is the only nation to have ever used nuclear
weapons against humanity.

If there is a country that constitutes a classic threat to
international peace and security, it is the U.S. The U.S. has been
involved in many conflicts and wars that resulted in unnecessary
killings of millions of innocent people. From Korea, Vietnam and
Cambodia to Palestine, Afghanistan and Iraq, millions of innocent
people have been massacred by U.S. forces.

No nation will surrender its rights and national independence in the
face of the threats posed by the U.S. and Israel to Iran. If Iran is
attacked without provacation, Iran has the right to retaliate in
self-defence. Self-defence against aggression is Iran’s inalienable
right and deserves the support of people wordwide. Like North Korea,
Iran has the right to pursue a self-defence policy of deterring a
future U.S. attack.

Global Research Contributing Editor Ghali Hassan lives in Perth,
Western Australia

Endnotes:

[1] Jimmy Carter, 'Saving Nonproliferation,’ Washington Post, 28 March,
2005.

[2] Avner Cohen & William Burr, 'Dangerous Doctrine’ the Bulletin of
Atomic Scientists, vol. 61(2), March/April 2005.

Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are the sole
responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of
the Centre for Research on Globalization.

To become a Member of Global Research

The Centre for Research on Globalization (CRG) at
www.globalresearch.ca grants permission to cross-post original Global
Research articles in their entirety, or any portions thereof, on
community internet sites, as long as the text & title are not modified.
The source must be acknowledged and an active URL hyperlink address to
the original CRG article must be indicated. The author's copyright note
must be displayed. For publication of Global Research articles in print
or other forms including commercial internet sites, contact:
crgeditor@yahoo.com

www.globalresearch.ca contains copyrighted material the use of which
has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We
are making such material available to our readers under the provisions
of "fair use" in an effort to advance a better understanding of
political, economic and social issues. The material on this site is
distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest
in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to
use copyrighted material for purposes other than "fair use" you must
request permission from the copyright owner.

To express your opinion on this article, join the discussion at Global
Research's News and Discussion Forum

For media inquiries: crgeditor@yahoo.com

The url address of this article is:
www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?
context=viewArticle&code=HAS20060527&articleId=2518

========================================================================
================================================================

From: "dahbud_mensch" <dahbud_mensch@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri May 26, 2006 7:16 am
Subject: Top 10 Signs of the Impending U.S. Police State

Top 10 Signs of the Impending U.S. Police State
By Allan Uthman,
Buffalo Beast. Posted May 26, 2006.

From secret detention centers to warrantless wiretapping, Bush and Co.
give free rein to their totalitarian impulses.

Is the U.S. becoming a police state? Here are the top 10 signs that it
may well be the case.

1. The Internet Clampdown

One saving grace of alternative media in this age of unfettered
corporate conglomeration has been the internet. While the masses are
spoon-fed predigested news on TV and in mainstream print publications,
the truth-seeking individual still has access to a broad array of
investigative reporting and political opinion via the world-wide web.
Of course, it was only a matter of time before the government moved to
patch up this crack in the sky.

Attempts to regulate and filter internet content are intensifying
lately, coming both from telecommunications corporations (who are
gearing up to pass legislation transferring ownership and regulation
of the internet to themselves), and the Pentagon (which issued an
"Information Operations Roadmap" in 2003, signed by Donald Rumsfeld,
which outlines tactics such as network attacks and acknowledges,
without suggesting a remedy, that US propaganda planted in other
countries has easily found its way to Americans via the internet). One
obvious tactic clearing the way for stifling regulation of internet
content is the growing media frenzy over child pornography and
"internet predators," which will surely lead to legislation that by
far exceeds in its purview what is needed to fight such threats.

2. "The Long War"

This little piece of clumsy marketing died off quickly, but it gave
away what many already suspected: the War on Terror will never end,
nor is it meant to end. It is designed to be perpetual. As with the
War on Drugs, it outlines a goal that can never be fully attained --
as long as there are pissed off people and explosives. The Long War
will eternally justify what are ostensibly temporary measures:
suspension of civil liberties, military expansion, domestic spying,
massive deficit spending and the like. This short-lived moniker told
us all, "get used to it. Things aren't going to change any time soon."

3. The USA PATRIOT Act

Did anyone really think this was going to be temporary? Yes, this
disgusting power grab gives the government the right to sneak into
your house, look through all your stuff and not tell you about it for
weeks on a rubber stamp warrant. Yes, they can look at your medical
records and library selections. Yes, they can pass along any
information they find without probable cause for purposes of
prosecution. No, they're not going to take it back, ever.

4. Prison Camps

This last January the Army Corps of Engineers gave Halliburton
subsidiary Kellogg Brown & Root nearly $400 million to build detention
centers in the United States, for the purpose of unspecified "new
programs." Of course, the obvious first guess would be that these new
programs might involve rounding up Muslims or political dissenters --
I mean, obviously detention facilities are there to hold somebody. I
wish I had more to tell you about this, but it's, you know... secret.

5. Touchscreen Voting Machines

Despite clear, copious evidence that these nefarious contraptions are
built to be tampered with, they continue to spread and dominate the
voting landscape, thanks to Bush's "Help America Vote Act," the
exploitation of corrupt elections officials, and the general public's
enduring cluelessness.

In Utah, Emery County Elections Director Bruce Funk witnessed security
testing by an outside firm on Diebold voting machines which showed
them to be a security risk. But his warnings fell on deaf ears.
Instead Diebold attorneys were flown to Emery County on the governor's
airplane to squelch the story. Funk was fired. In Florida, Leon County
Supervisor of Elections Ion Sancho discovered an alarming security
flaw in their Diebold system at the end of last year. Rather than fix
the flaw, Diebold refused to fulfill its contract. Both of the other
two touchscreen voting machine vendors, Sequoia and ES&S, now refuse
to do business with Sancho, who is required by HAVA to implement a
touchscreen system and will be sued by his own state if he doesn't.
Diebold is said to be pressuring for Sancho's ouster before it will
resume servicing the county.

Stories like these and much worse abound, and yet TV news outlets have
done less coverage of the new era of elections fraud than even 9/11
conspiracy theories. This is possibly the most important story of this
century, but nobody seems to give a damn. As long as this issue is
ignored, real American democracy will remain an illusion. The midterm
elections will be an interesting test of the public's continuing
gullibility about voting integrity, especially if the Democrats don't
win substantial gains, as they almost surely will if everything is
kosher.

Bush just suggested that his brother Jeb would make a good president.
We really need to fix this problem soon.

6. Signing Statements

Bush has famously never vetoed a bill. This is because he prefers to
simply nullify laws he doesn't like with "signing statements." Bush
has issued over 700 such statements, twice as many as all previous
presidents combined. A few examples of recently passed laws and their
corresponding dismissals, courtesy of the Boston Globe:

--Dec. 30, 2005: US interrogators cannot torture prisoners or
otherwise subject them to cruel, inhuman, and degrading treatment.

Bush's signing statement: The president, as commander in chief,
can waive the torture ban if he decides that harsh interrogation
techniques will assist in preventing terrorist attacks.

--Dec. 30, 2005: When requested, scientific information ''prepared
by government researchers and scientists shall be transmitted [to
Congress] uncensored and without delay."

Bush's signing statement: The president can tell researchers to
withhold any information from Congress if he decides its disclosure
could impair foreign relations, national security, or the workings of
the executive branch.

--Dec. 23, 2004: Forbids US troops in Colombia from participating
in any combat against rebels, except in cases of self-defense. Caps
the number of US troops allowed in Colombia at 800.

Bush's signing statement: Only the president, as commander in
chief, can place restrictions on the use of US armed forces, so the
executive branch will construe the law ''as advisory in nature."

Essentially, this administration is bypassing the judiciary and
deciding for itself whether laws are constitutional or not. Somehow, I
don't see the new Supreme Court lineup having much of a problem with
that, though. So no matter what laws congress passes, Bush will simply
choose to ignore the ones he doesn't care for. It's much quieter than
a veto, and can't be overridden by a two-thirds majority. It's also
totally absurd.

7. Warrantless Wiretapping

Amazingly, the GOP sees this issue as a plus for them. How can this
be? What are you, stupid? You find out the government is listening to
the phone calls of US citizens, without even the weakest of judicial
oversight and you think that's okay? Come on -- if you know anything
about history, you know that no government can be trusted to handle
something like this responsibly. One day they're listening for Osama,
and the next they're listening in on Howard Dean.

Think about it: this administration hates unauthorized leaks. With no
judicial oversight, why on earth wouldn't they eavesdrop on, say,
Seymour Hersh, to figure out who's spilling the beans? It's a
no-brainer. Speaking of which, it bears repeating: terrorists already
knew we would try to spy on them. They don't care if we have a warrant
or not. But you should.

8. Free Speech Zones

I know it's old news, but... come on, are they fucking serious?

9. High-ranking Whistleblowers

Army Generals. Top-level CIA officials. NSA operatives. White House
cabinet members. These are the kind of people that Republicans
fantasize about being, and whose judgment they usually respect. But
for some reason, when these people resign in protest and criticize the
Bush administration en masse, they are cast as traitorous,
anti-American publicity hounds. Ridiculous. The fact is, when people
who kill, spy and deceive for a living tell you that the White House
has gone too far, you had damn well better pay attention. We all know
most of these people are staunch Republicans. If the entire military
except for the two guys the Pentagon put in front of the press wants
Rumsfeld out, why on earth wouldn't you listen?

10. The CIA Shakeup

Was Porter Goss fired because he was resisting the efforts of Rumsfeld
or Negroponte? No. These appointments all come from the same guys, and
they wouldn't be nominated if they weren't on board all the way. Goss
was probably canned so abruptly due to a scandal involving a crooked
defense contractor, his hand-picked third-in-command, the Watergate
hotel and some hookers.

If Bush's nominee for CIA chief, Air Force General Michael Hayden, is
confirmed, that will put every spy program in Washington under
military control. Hayden, who oversaw the NSA warrantless wiretapping
program and is clearly down with the program. That program? To weaken
and dismantle or at least neuter the CIA. Despite its best efforts to
blame the CIA for "intelligence errors" leading to the Iraq war, the
picture has clearly emerged -- through extensive CIA leaks -- that the
White House's analysis of Saddam's destructive capacity was not shared
by the Agency. This has proved to be a real pain in the ass for Bush
and the gang.

Who'd have thought that career spooks would have moral qualms about
deceiving the American people? And what is a president to do about it?
Simple: make the critical agents leave, and fill their slots with
Bush/Cheney loyalists. Then again, why not simply replace the entire
organization? That is essentially what both Rumsfeld at the DoD and
newly minted Director of National Intelligence John are doing -- they
want to move intelligence analysis into the hands of people that they
can control, so the next time they lie about an "imminent threat"
nobody's going to tell. And the press is applauding the move as a
"necessary reform."

Remember the good old days, when the CIA were the bad guys?

Source: http://www.alternet.org/story/36553/

========================================================================
================================================

From: "erik larson" <91erik@gmail.com>
Date: May 27, 2006 2:05:32 PM EST
Subject: [911TruthAction] "It Can't Happen Here"
Reply-To: 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com

Everyone see this article?

"Make no mistake about it: those images from Paris and Los Angeles
scare the shit out of the criminals in Washington, as can be discerned
from the tone of the news coverage provided by the Western media. They
look at those masses of humanity and begin picturing such scenes in
every big city across this nation. And then they imagine public anger
becoming so widespread that they begin to lose control of the
militarized law enforcement agencies all across the country that they
rely upon to keep the masses at bay."

http://www.davesweb.cnchost.com/nwsltr81.html

========================================================================
=================================================================

From: Cathy Garger <savorsuccesslady@yahoo.com>
Date: May 28, 2006 6:59:26 AM EST
Subject: [911TruthAction] NIST Says No to Debate On 9/11 Science
Reply-To: 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com

As many of you have already read, Philip Berg, Esq., Dr. James
Fetzer, Dr. David Ray Griffin, Dr. Steven Jones, Dr. Morgan Reynolds,
Col. George Nelson, USAF (ret.) and Dr. Judy Wood are planning
to participate in the National 9/11 Debate on September 16, 2006 in
Charleston, South Carolina.

Members of the 9/11 Commission, government scientists from the National
Institute of Standards and Technology, and other supporting experts
were invited to participate and represent the government’s debate team.

I received this document (below and attached) from Dr. Griffin last
night. It states that NIST (National Institute of Standards and
Technology) is not interested in a debate with these 9/11 experts.

One can hardly blame NIST. After all, how can NIST hope to go up
against expertly presented technical and scientific proof?

Also, here is an Open Letter to the 9/11 Commission that sure packs a
punch. http://www.teamliberty.net/id264.html

The fact that NIST is unwilling to defend the claims it has made to the
American public - must be spread far and wide. They are gallinas - and
for good reason. NIST and the rest of the federal workers can say
whatever they want to the controlled media, but when it comes down to
being able to defend their case in front of learned experts with hard
science? Of course NIST fully realizes that their efforts can only turn
to ultra-fine particulate GZ dust.

Cathy Garger
http://mytown.ca/garger/

--------------------------------------------------------

Ed Haas: "Government spokesman says, ‘I don’t understand the public’s
fascination with World Trade Center Building Seven,’" Muckraker Report,
March 21, 200 (http://www.teamliberty.net/id235.html).
†

March 21, 2006 – Michael E. Newman, Public and Business Affairs
spokesman for the National Institute of Standards and Technology
(NIST), in a phone interview with the Muckraker Report on Monday, March
20th, said that he didn’t "understand the public’s fascination with
World Trade Center Building Seven."† Newman was contacted by the
Muckraker Report to discuss when the National Institute of Standards
and Technology anticipated releasing its report regarding how World
Trade Center Building Seven collapsed onto its footprint at 5:20p.m.
EST on September 11, 2001.
†
What I found so interesting about my 30-minute conversation with Newman
was how easily he discounted as unfounded conspiracies, the findings
and opinions of scientists who are operating outside of the
government’s payroll.† He frequently used analogies to conspiracy
theories and urban legends such as Bigfoot and UFO’s.† At one point
Newman said that he has joked with members of his Public and Business
Affairs that they might as well conduct press conferences wearing
"Bigfoot" costumes because "no matter what we say, some people will not
believe the government".† Newman continued, "For some people, no matter
what the government says about 9/11, they will still believe that the
government is lying.† Some people still believe the world is flat and
there are UFO’s.† There’s nothing the federal government can say to
convince these people otherwise."†
†
When I mentioned to Newman that we’re not talking about nutcases from
Kooksville, but rather credentialed scientists such as BYU Physics
Professor, Stephen E. Jones, Claremont Professor Emeritus, David Ray
Griffin, and Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) Engineer, Jeff
King, he said, "Just because a person is from MIT doesn’t mean that
they know what they’re talking about."† Assuming that Newman is right,
then it must be noted that the Lead Technical Investigator for the NIST
National Construction Safety Team for WTC Investigation is a gentleman
named Shyam Sunder, who incidentally, received his doctoral degree in
structural engineering from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology
(MIT) in 1981.[1]†
†
I asked Newman whether his agency had a compelling interest to produce
a report regarding the collapse of the Twin Towers that substantiated
the 9/11 Commission Report.† He indicated that NIST had no such
interest.† When asked if NIST would produce and release a report on
World Trade Center Building Seven, even if the Institute’s conclusions
reveal that WTC-7 did in fact collapse as the direct result of a
controlled demolition, Newman said that NIST would release such a
report if that turns out to be its findings.†
†
Intrigued by Newman’s ability to maintain a persona of impartiality and
claimed dedication to truthfulness while he simultaneously scoffed, if
not ridiculed any scientist who disagrees with the government’s
scientists and their findings, I decided to test his dedication to
impartiality and whether NIST had any predisposition towards finding a
cause of collapse of WTC Building Seven that will coincide with the
government’s account of 9/11. I asked him about the now infamous public
statements made by Larry Silverstein, the controller of the World Trade
Center Complex.† Recall that on a PBS documentary that aired in
September 2002, Silverstein said that he and the New York Fire
Department decided jointly to "pull" WTC-7.† Here is the exact
Silverstein quote from the 2002 PBS documentary.†
†
"I remember getting a call from the ER, Fire Department Commander,
telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain
the fire, and I said, ‘We’ve had such terrible loss of life, maybe the
smartest thing to do is ‘pull it.’† And they made the decision to
‘pull’ and we watched the building collapse."†
†
Almost immediately after I finished referencing Silverstein as saying
that the "smartest thing to do is pull it", Newman responded with a
condescending chuckle to remind me that the federal government is
always right, and the people, always wrong.† He then said, "Silverstein
already explained that what he meant was that they decided to pull the
firefighters and emergency rescue workers from World Trade Center
Building Seven."† One can only hope that NIST doesn’t consider its
investigation into what Silverstein meant by his usage of the words,
"pull it" as complete, solely on an ambiguous clarification offered
years later by a man (Silverstein) that certainly has a financial and
personal interest in the government’s official account of 9/11
prevailing.†††
†
After Newman finished minimizing the value of the Silverstein comment
as essentially worthless, I pointed out to him the fact that
organizations such as Scholars for 9/11 Truth and 9/11 Revisited
certainly seemed to be presenting thoughtful and scientific information
that refuted much of the work by the government’s scientists at NIST.†
I expressed to him my concern that more than half of all Americans now
believe the U.S. government has some complicity if not culpability
regarding 9/11, with many people now believing that 9/11 is nothing
more than a massive government cover-up; a public perception Newman did
not refute. However, when I suggested that a possible method to
reconcile the division in the United States between the government and
its people might be for a series of televised national debates between
his thirty scientists assigned to investigate how World Trade Center
Buildings – 1, 2, & 7 collapsed onto their footprints on September 11,
2001, I was abruptly interrupted and told that none of the NIST
scientists would participate in any public debate.†
†
Curious, I asked why the National Institute of Standards and Technology
would avoid public debate, particularly if it was confident in its
work.† Newman responded, "Because there is no winning in such
debates."† When I pointed out that such a debate between the thirty
scientists who worked on the NIST 9/11 Investigation and thirty
equally-qualified scientists who dispute, and claim to be able to
refute the NIST findings; that such a public, televised debate might
actually help answer many of the public’s questions and possibly
restore some national unity, the NIST spokesman emphatically insisted
that such a debate will never occur.
†
As precociously as Michael E. Newman presented himself as a government
man, and therefore trustworthy, the inconsistencies in his agency’s
work pertaining to how the Twin Towers collapsed will persist if NIST
and its lot of government scientists don’t publicly debate with
non-government scientists that are presently and publicly disputing the
government’s findings.†
†
Glaring evidence of a fallible, if not predisposed government agency is
found on the National Institute of Standards and Technology web site.†
For example, NIST lists as one if its main 9/11 investigation
objectives as to determine:
†
* Why and how World Trade Center buildings 1, 2, and 7 collapsed after
the initial impact of the aircraft [2]†
†
Note: In the event that NIST changes the aforementioned misleading
language on its web site, go here http://teamliberty.net/id236.html to
see how the web page read as of March 20, 2006.†
†
Why is the false statement on the NIST web site?† The National
Institute of Standards and Technology knows, along with the rest of the
world, that no aircraft impacted WTC-7.† Yet on its web site, it uses
language that suggests that WTC-7 was also collided into by an
aircraft.† Is it any wonder why Americans are struggling to accept the
government’s 9/11 story when a federal agency intended to set the
standard is demonstrating to the world that its own standard of
accuracy regarding the dissemination of information is woefully
inadequate?†
†
This lack of standards is demonstrated again in the National Institute
of Standards and Technology - Executive Summary, which is a portion of
its report regarding how the Twin Towers collapsed.†† Listed as Finding
59, NIST reported:
†
* NIST found no corroborating evidence for alternative hypotheses
suggesting that the WTC towers were brought down by controlled
demolition using explosives planted prior to September 11, 2001.† NIST
also did not find any evidence that missiles were fired at or hit the
towers.† Instead, photographs and videos from several angles clearly
showed that the collapse initiated at the fire and impact floors and
that the collapse progressed from the initiating floors downward, until
the dust clouds obscured the view.†

Amazingly, the government sees the dust clouds produced during the
collapse of the Twin Towers as an obstruction of view, while
scientists, outside the government’s control, see the volume, density,
and speed of outward projection from the buildings during the collapse
that the dust clouds demonstrated, as evidence of secondary explosive
devices.†† Whether secondary explosive devices caused or assisted the
collapse of the Twin Towers or not, the dust clouds were and remain
compelling evidence that the government, by their own admission, missed
or ignored.
†
Seeing as NIST scientists couldn’t see the fact that the dust clouds
were themselves, evidence, and not obstructions, is it possible for the
National Institute of Standard and Technology to be taken seriously,
let alone, trusted?† Why is the public so fascinated with WTC-7 Mr.
Newman?† We are so fascinated by it because the events of September 11,
2001 were a national tragedy with many valid and unanswered questions
remaining in the public mind.†
†
If there is a weak link in a government cover-up, World Trade Center
Building Seven is it.† If WTC-7 is found to have collapsed as a result
of a controlled demolition, than the NIST report on the Twin Towers
will be aggressively scrutinized because the question of how and when
explosive devices were wired into WTC-7 would have to be answered. By
answering that question, a new truth regarding WTC-1 and WTC-2 might be
revealed.††
†
Does NIST have a compelling interest to report that WTC-7 defied the
laws of physics also on September 11, 2001 and miraculously collapsed
at freefall speed as the result of office fires?† You bet it does!† Can
the National Institute of Standards and Technology be trusted as a
competent federal agency that will deliver an untainted, truthful
analysis of WTC-7 regardless of what that truth might be?† I’ll leave
the answer to that question up to you.†

------------------------------------------------------------------------
[1] National Institute of Standards and Technology, Project Leaders,
National Construction Safety Team for WTC Investigation, Shyam Sunder,
http://wtc.nist.gov/pi/wtc_profiles.asp?lastname=sunder, [Accessed
March 20, 2006]
[2] NIST & The World Trade Center, Fact Sheets,
http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/factsheets/faqs.htm, [Accessed March 20, 2006]

========================================================================
==================================

From: "PEERS: WantToKnow.info List" <noreply2@wanttoknow.info>
Date: May 27, 2006 12:08:14 PM EST
To: prez@usa-exile.org
Subject: Newsweek reports "most serious voting-machine flaws ever"

This message is available online at
http://www.WantToKnow.info/060527electionsvotesmanipulations

"Experts are calling them the most serious voting-machine flaws ever
documented. It requires only a few minutes of pre-election access to a
Diebold machine to open the machine and insert a PC card that, if it
contained malicious code, could reprogram the machine to give control
to the violator. The machine could go dead on Election Day or throw
votes to the wrong candidate. Worse, it's even possible for such
ballot-tampering software to trick authorized technicians into thinking
that everything is working fine, an illusion you couldn't pull off with
pre-electronic systems."
-- Newsweek, 5/29/06 issue

Dear friends,

Our form of representative democracy is based on an elections system in
which each person gets one vote and the majority decides who is elected
to represent us in government. In order for this system to be truly
representative, it is vital that the vote of each person participating
is counted. The below Newsweek article reveals a clear and present
danger to our democratic process with the widespread use of electronic
voting machines. Major security flaws have been reported to exist in
these machines for years now, yet the media appears not to have seen
this as a high priority. Why isn't this vital news making the top
headlines?

Besides the important article below, you can see one-paragraph
summaries of some of the best major media articles raising serious
questions on elections manipulations at
http://www.WantToKnow.info/electronicvoting. For an abundance of
reliable, verifiable information on various aspects of the manipulation
of votes and elections, see our Elections Information Center at
http://www.WantToKnow.info/electionsinformation. By choosing to educate
ourselves and spreading the word to our friends and colleagues, I have
no doubt that we can and will build a brighter future for ourselves and
for future generations.

With best wishes,
Fred Burks for PEERS and the WantToKnow.info Team
Former language interpreter for Presidents Bush and Clinton

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/12888600/site/newsweek

Will Your Vote Count in 2006?

By Steven Levy
Newsweek

May 29, 2006 issue - Just when you thought it was safe to go back into
the voting booth, here comes more disturbing news about the
trustworthiness of electronic touchscreen ballot machines. Earlier this
month a report by Finnish security expert Harri Hursti analyzed Diebold
voting machines for an organization called Black Box Voting. Hursti
found unheralded vulnerabilities in the machines that are currently
entrusted to faithfully record the votes of millions of Americans.

How bad are the problems? Experts are calling them the most serious
voting-machine flaws ever documented. Basically the trouble stems from
the ease with which the machine's software can be altered. It requires
only a few minutes of pre-election access to a Diebold machine to open
the machine and insert a PC card that, if it contained malicious code,
could reprogram the machine to give control to the violator. The
machine could go dead on Election Day or throw votes to the wrong
candidate. Worse, it's even possible for such ballot-tampering software
to trick authorized technicians into thinking that everything is
working fine, an illusion you couldn't pull off with pre-electronic
systems. "If Diebold had set out to build a system as insecure as they
possibly could, this would be it," says Avi Rubin, a Johns Hopkins
University computer-science professor and elections-security expert.

Diebold Election Systems spokesperson David Bear says Hursti's findings
do not represent a fatal vulnerability in Diebold technology, but
simply note the presence of a feature that allows access to authorized
technicians to periodically update the software. If it so happens that
someone not supposed to use the machine—or an election official who
wants to put his or her thumb on the scale of democracy—takes advantage
of this fast track to fraud, that's not Diebold's problem. "[Our
critics are] throwing out a 'what if' that's premised on a basis of an
evil, nefarious person breaking the law," says Bear.

Those familiar with the actual election process—by and large run by
honest people but historically subject to partisan politicking, dirty
tricks and sloppy practices—are less sanguine. "It gives me a bit of
alarm that the voting systems are subject to tampering and errors,"
says Democratic Rep. William Lacy Clay, who worries that machines in
his own St. Louis district might be affected by this vulnerability. (In
Maryland and Georgia, all the machines are Diebold's.)

The Diebold security gap is only the most vivid example of the reality
that no electronic voting system can be 100 percent safe or reliable.
That's the reason behind an initiative to augment these systems, adding
a paper receipt that voters can check to make sure it conforms with
their choices. The receipt is retained at the polling place so a
physical count can be conducted. "When you're using a paperless voting
system, there is no security," says David Dill, a Stanford professor
who founded the election-reform organization Verified Voting.

To their credit, 26 states have taken action to implement paper trails.
But the U.S. Congress has yet to pass legislation introduced last year
by Rep. Rush Holt, Democrat of New Jersey, that would extend this
protection nationwide. Holt says his bill is slowly gaining support.
"The voters are saying that every vote should count, and the only way
to do this is by verified audit trails," he says. But even an
optimistic scenario for passage would challenge his goal of mandatory
paper receipts for November's elections. In other words, it's unlikely
that every voter using an electronic voting device in 2006 will know
for sure that his or her vote will be reflected in the actual totals.
Six years after the 2000 electoral debacle, how can this be?

Final Note: WantToKnow.info believes it is important to balance
disturbing cover-up information with inspirational writings which call
us to be all that we can be and to work together for positive change.
Please visit our Inspiration Center at
http://www.WantToKnow.info/inspirational for an abundance of uplifting
material.

See our archive of revealing news articles at
http://www.WantToKnow.info/coverupnews

Your tax-deductible donations, however large or small, help greatly to
support this important work.
To make a donation by credit card, check, or money order:
http://www.WantToKnow.info/donationswtk

Explore these empowering websites coordinated by the nonprofit PEERS
network:
http://www.momentoflove.org - Every person in the world has a heart
http://www.WantToKnow.info - Reliable, verifiable information on major
cover-ups
http://www.inspiringcommunity.org - Building a Global Community for All
http://www.weboflove.org - Strengthening the Web of Love that
interconnects us all
Educational websites promoting transformation through information and
inspiration

To reply to this message, visit
http://www.WantToKnow.info/contactus.php
To subscribe to or unsubscribe from the WantToKnow.info list (one
email every few days):
http://www.WantToKnow.info/subscribe

========================================================================
=================================================================

From: "Jacob G. Stansbury, Jr." <damor1@cox.net>
Date: May 27, 2006 9:59:11 PM EST
Subject: WEST POINT GRADUATES AGAINST THE WAR

This is outstanding!

General Kwiatkowski interviewed James Ryan, co-founder of West Point
Graduates Against The War on her RBN radio program tonight. This is a
great step towards assisting our men and women in uniform in
understanding their constitutional duties. It's great!

"A cadet will not lie, cheat, or steal, or tolerate those who do."
(Cadet Honor Code )

http://westpointgradsagainstthewar.org/

========================================================================
=================================

----------

Classified French DGSE Intelligence Report:
Al Qaeda Training Camp Passed from Control of CIA to
Bin Laden in 1995

by Wayne Madsen
May 27, 2006

Wayne Madsen Report - 2006-05-23

WASHINGTON, D.C. -- WMR has obtained a confidential "France Only"
report of the French intelligence service, Direction Generale de la
Securite Exterieure (DGSE), that states that the CIA and Britain's MI-6
maintained effective control of an important Al Qaeda training camp in
Afghanistan as late as 1995, fully two years after the 1993 bombing of
the World Trade Center, an attack that was launched with the help of
Sudanese intelligence officers loyal to Osama Bin Laden. The CIA and
MI6 permitted control of training operations at Darunta, an "Arab
Afghan" base located near the camp of Osama Bin Laden and used to
manufacture explosives and chemical weapons and train in their use, to
pass to the control of Ibn Cheikh, a Libyan leader of Al Qaeda.

The DGSE report, dated January 9, 2001, is classified "Defense
Confidential" and "National (French) Use Only" states, "Besides the
Maghreb enclave, the training at Darunta, which, for approximately 2
months, mainly involved the manufacture and the use of the explosives
by terrorists. This training, initially provided at the camp of
Khalden, in Paktia, was transferred during 1995, on the order of Ibn
Cheikh, to Darunta, in order to slide [the training] from the control
of the security services of certain countries, in particular the United
States and the United Kingdom."

The report continues by stating that in 1998, the training was expanded
to include the use of C-4 plastic explosives and different types of
detonators (electric, acid, etc.). Training also included the use of
homemade explosives (like improvised explosive devices killing so many
in Iraq today) and poisons such as arsenic, cyanide, gas, diamond
powder, nicotine, and ricin. After Al Qaeda took control of Darunta
from the CIA and MI6, the camp was used to train Al Qaeda operatives to
launch a series of deadly attacks, including the November 19, 1995
attack on the Egyptian embassy in Islamabad, the 1998 attacks on the US
embassy in Nairobi, the abortive Dec. 31, 1999 "Millennium" attack on
Los Angeles International Airport by Algerian Ahmed Ressam, and the
attack on the USS Cole.

In 1995, James Woolsey left as CIA Director and was replaced by John
Deutch. Deutch's deputy was George Tenet, who previously served in Bill
Clinton's National Security Council. The National Security Adviser was
Tony Lake. The House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (HPSCI)
was chaired by Larry Combest of Lubbock, Texas and 1995 was the year
Porter Goss joined the CIA oversight committee. On November 12, 2002,
only a week after winning his 10th term, Combest suddenly announced his
resignation from the House. Goss took over the HPSCI gavel from Combest
in 1997, after serving only two years on the committee. In 1995, the
Chairman of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence was Arlen
Specter, a person whose fingerprints, like those of Goss, have been all
over shady intelligence operations since the early 1960s. CIA
intelligence analyst Michael Scheuer formed the CIA's Bin Laden Unit in
1996.

Two significant items emerge from the DGSE report. One is the fact that
the CIA and MI6 were dealing with a Libyan Al Qaeda member at the same
time Libyan leader Muammar el Qaddafi had declared war on Al Qaeda.
Unlike the United States, Libya issued an Interpol arrest warrant for
Bin Laden on March 16, 1998. With this treasure trove of proof of U.S.
(and British) support for Al Qaeda, Qaddafi had the U.S. and the
neo-cons over the barrel. It is not surprising, therefore, that the
Bush administration now considers Qaddafi (once branded as terrorist
number one) to be a good friend.

The other item is the training of Ahmed Ressam at Darunta. Bill
Clinton's National Security Adviser Sandy Berger was charged with
removing classified documents from the National Archives concerning the
Ressam bombing plot. The question remains -- what were in these
documents and did they have anything to do with the CIA's fingerprints
on the Darunta camp?

Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are the sole
responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of
the Centre for Research on Globalization.

To become a Member of Global Research

To express your opinion on this article, join the discussion at Global
Research's News and Discussion Forum

For media inquiries: crgeditor@yahoo.com

The url address of this article is:
www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?
context=viewArticle&code=MAD20060527&articleId=2523

========================================================================
================================================

From: David West <davidgordonwest@yahoo.co.uk>
Date: May 27, 2006 10:50:47 AM EST
To: prez@usa-exile.org
Subject: Marijuana May Not Raise Risk of Lung Cancer

From: "thew" thew@neuronautic.com
Date: Fri May 26, 2006 10:24am(PDT)

Study: Marijuana May Not Raise Risk of Lung Cancer
May 24, 2006

A new study found that while cigarette smoking greatly increased the
risk of lung cancer, smoking marijuana did not seem to have any
effect, Fox News reported May 23.

Researchers from the UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine said they
were surprised by the findings. "We know that there are as many or
more carcinogens and co-carcinogens in marijuana smoke as in
cigarettes," said researcher Donald Tashkin. "But we did not find any
evidence for an increase in cancer risk for even heavy marijuana
smoking."

The study involved participants aged 60 and younger, including 611
lung-cancer patients and 601 patients with other cancers of the head
and neck. The cancer patients were compared to a control group of
1,040 people without cancer.

Heavy marijuana smokers were those who self-reported smoking more
than 22,000 joints during their lifetime. Researchers found that
people who smoked two packs of cigarettes per day increased their
cancer risk twentyfold, but even the heaviest marijuana smokers had
no elevated risk. They also said that cancer risk among cigarette
smokers rose in proportion to how much they smoked.

Previous studies have found that marijuana smoke has high levels of
carcinogens, and that marijuana smokers inhale deeply, which would be
expected to increase their risk of cancer. But some observers say
that the THC in marijuana may have some protective properties that
prevent cancers from forming or thriving.

The findings were presented at the American Thoracic Society's 102nd
International Conference in San Diego.

========================================================================
===============================================================

From: "dahbud_mensch" <dahbud_mensch@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat May 27, 2006 8:44 am
Subject: The Yellow Stain from Texas dahbud_mensch

The Yellow Stain from Texas:

There's a Yellow Stain from Texas , in Washington DC,

The leader of the free world representing you and me.

He claims to stand for values. What values might those be?

The only one he's shown so far is called hypocrisy.

He loves domestic spying, ignores the Bill of Rights

The only group he represents is the religious right.

He's defied the constitution, he's a scoundrel, plain to see.

The Yellow Stain from Texas is no president to me.

He panders to big oil, serves the rich but not the poor

He represents the end of all this country once stood for

He says he's got compassion, then kills thousands in Iraq

While oilmen and 'Born agains' just pat him on the back.

He stole the Oval Office, he's trampled on our rights,

But just the same we're all to blame, if we don't set things right.

He's tossed away due process, your right to privacy.

The Yellow Stain from Texas is no president to me.

He points to "nine-eleven," and that is his excuse

For torture, war and deficits. and prisoner abuse.

He's a Yellow Stain from Texas, our nation's greatest shame.

His lies killed more Iraqis, than Saddam Hussein.

Bill Clinton's Presidency sure had its share of flaws

We all recall the problems that a little stain can cause

So let's remove this BIG stain, serve justice while we can

We'd best impeach him quickly, before he bombs Iran.

Oh the Yellow Stain from Texas is a stain upon us all

Got to do some stain removing, or democracy will fall.

He's the Yellow Stain from Texas , a traitor, plain to see.

The Yellow Stain from Texas is no president to me.

========================================================================
==============================================================

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 10
From: "Ronald" bleier.r@gmail.com
Date: Sun May 28, 2006 10:49am(PDT)
Subject: Fw: NYT (1993): FBI allowed the WTC bombing to happen

The FBI allowed the 1993
WTC bombing to happen

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

THE NEW YORK TIMES

* * * * *

Thursday October 28, 1993 Page A1

"Tapes Depict Proposal to Thwart
Bomb Used in Trade Center Blast"

By Ralph Blumenthal

Law-enforcement officials were told that terrorists were building
a bomb that was eventually used to blow up the World Trade Center,
and they planned to thwart the plotters by secretly substituting
harmless powder for the explosives, an informer said after
the blast.

The informer was to have helped the plotters build the bomb
and supply the fake powder, but the plan was called off by
an F.B.I. supervisor who had other ideas about how the informer,
Emad Salem, should be used, the informer said.

The account, which is given in the transcript of hundreds of
hours of tape recordings that Mr. Salem secretly made of his
talks with law-enforcement agents, portrays the authorities as
being in a far better position than previously known to foil
the February 26th bombing of New York City's tallest towers.

The explosion left six people dead, more than a thousand people
injured, and damages in excess of half-a-billion dollars.
Four men are now on trial in Manhattan Federal Court
[on charges of involvement] in that attack.

Mr. Salem, a 43-year-old former Egyptian Army officer, was used
by the Government [of the United States] to penetrate a circle
of Muslim extremists who are now charged in two bombing cases:
the World Trade Center attack, and a foiled plot to destroy
the United Nations, the Hudson River tunnels, and other
New York City landmarks. He is the crucial witness in the
second bombing case, but his work for the Government was
erratic, and for months before the World Trade Center blast,
he was feuding with the F.B.I.

Supervisor `Messed It Up'

After the bombing, he resumed his undercover work. In an
undated transcript of a conversation from that period,
Mr. Salem recounts a talk he had had earlier with an agent
about an unnamed F.B.I. supervisor who, he said,

"came and messed it up."
"He requested to meet me in the hotel,"

Mr. Salem says of the supervisor.

"He requested to make me to testify, and if he didn't
push for that, we'll be going building the bomb with
a phony powder, and grabbing the people who was
involved in it. But since you, we didn't do that."

The transcript quotes Mr. Salem as saying that he wanted to
complain to F.B.I. Headquarters in Washington about the
Bureau's failure to stop the bombing, but was dissuaded by
an agent identified as John Anticev.

Mr. Salem said Mr. Anticev had told him,

"He said, I don't think that the New York people would
like the things out of the New York Office to go to
Washington, D.C."

Another agent, identified as Nancy Floyd, does not dispute
Mr. Salem's account, but rather, appears to agree with it,
saying of the `New York people':

"Well, of course not, because they don't want to
get their butts chewed."

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The result of the explosion:

a.. 6 civilians killed
b.. Over 1,000 injured
c.. 105 firefighters injured - 5 admitted to local hospitals
d.. reinforced floors almost 30 inches think blasted away on 3 levels below grade, plus a concourse level floor, leaving a crater about 150 feet in diameter at it's largest point.
e.. On the B1 level, the operations control center of the Port Authority Police Department (and the fire command station forthe complex) was heavily damaged and rendered out of service.
f.. On the B2 level, various walls of elevator shafts and freshair plenums severely damaged, allowing smoke to enter and rise through the cores of both towers.
g.. Numerous concrete walls destroyed or damaged.
h.. 200,000 cubic feet of water poured into the lowest grade from damaged refrigeration unit supplies (from the Hudson River), sewer lines, fresh domestic water lines, steam pipes, and condensate return. Water 1.5 feet deep across the B6 level.
i.. 124 parked cars destroyed, 102 damaged.
j.. Partition walls blown out onto PATH train mezzanine.
k.. Numerous telephone conduits collapsed from ceiling onto cars (but phone service was not cut, miraculously).
l.. Fire alarm and public address systems out of service.
m.. Elevators out of service.
n.. Water cooled emergency generators shut down due to overheating when their water supply was cut. This disabled the emergency lighting.
o.. Sprinklers & standpipes out of service.
p.. 2,500 tons of rubble removed.
q.. Clean up effort involved 2,700 workers per day, plus a total of 160,000 gallons of cleaning fluid and 200,00 gallons of detergent.
r.. Restoration cost: $250,000,000.

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 11
From: "DOUGLAS CLARK" bushsept11mastermind@yahoo.com
Date: Sun May 28, 2006 11:11am(PDT)
Subject: Re: Well oh my golly my GOSH!

BOAST...BRAG...AND MAY "GOD" BLESS YOUR EFFORTS!!

Kevin Hammond <sir_oglaigh@yahoo.com> wrote: Awe geee shux!

Jamie Welsh <jamie@xenic.com> wrote: it's ok boast away kevin! you make me proud.
-jamie

On May 28, 2006, at 10:06 AM, Kevin Lee Hammond wrote:

---------------------------------
Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Make PC-to-Phone Calls to the US (and 30+ countries) for 2¢/min or less.

---------------------------------

Saoirse go deo! www.fightthenwo.org
---------------------------------
Sneak preview the all-new Yahoo.com. It's not radically different. Just radically better.

SPONSORED LINKS
United state grant United state patent United state flag Trademark united state United state coin United state citizenship

---------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

---------------------------------

---------------------------------
How low will we go? Check out Yahoo! Messenger’s low PC-to-Phone call rates.
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 12
From: "Jarrett Smith" Jarret.Smith@ntlworld.com
Date: Sun May 28, 2006 0:16pm(PDT)
Subject: Re: Well oh my golly my GOSH!

Me too, sounds like you're doing a great job.

Jarrett

--- In 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com, Jamie Welsh <jamie@...> wrote:
>
> it's ok boast away kevin! you make me proud.
> -jamie
>
> On May 28, 2006, at 10:06 AM, Kevin Lee Hammond wrote:
>
> > As I was on my way out the door from work fri eve. my boss stopped

> > me and asked if I knew where he could get a copy of loose change!

> > Could it be perhaps because I have given a copy to each of my co-
> > workers and made sure that they watched it?! Could it be also,
> > That I have woken up damn near every shop owner and worker on the
> > block where I work?! With copies of not only Loose Change, but
> > also of martial Law and other such dvds!. One woman in turn took
> > them to her church and woke up her entire congregation! Please do

> > not take this as boasting bu t as just informing you all of the
> > fact that folks are WAKING UP!
> >
> > Kevin
> > www.fightthenwo.org
> >
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Make PC-to-Phone Calls to the US (and

> > 30+ countries) for 2¢/min or less.
> >
> > SPONSORED LINKS
> > United state army United state grant United state
government grant
> > United state patent United state flag United state citizenship
> >
> > YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
> >
> > Visit your group "911TruthAction" on the web.
> >
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > 911TruthAction-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service.
> >
> >
>

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 13
From: "Jarrett Smith" Jarret.Smith@ntlworld.com
Date: Sun May 28, 2006 0:22pm(PDT)
Subject: Re: Don't post Nazi garbage to this list! -was Great New Racial Blog

Hi Mark,

I just want to say you're spot on. I'm new to this blog but I already
figured this much out...

Jarrett

--- In 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com,

Mark S Bilk <mark@...> wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 04:16:40PM -0700, Susan Enders wrote:
> >
> > [Nazi white-power racist garbage]
>
> 9-11 was done by (1) the Neocons, led by the Bush family who
> financed Hitler in the 1930s, and (2) by the Zionists who
> collaborated with Hitler during WWII and who are practicing
> racist genocide against the Palestinians. The purpose of 9-11 was
> to justify a racist war to make a lot of money for rich people,
> and to take freedom away from ordinary people -- the same as the
> motives of the American and German Nazis/Fascists in WWII.
>
> So fuck off and die, Susan Enders, you are the enemy we're fighting!
>
> Mark
>

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 14
From: "Edward Pickersgill" edward@mytown.ca
Date: Sun May 28, 2006 0:44pm(PDT)
Subject: [Underling Incarcerated in our own gloomy grey cells

underling: SANITY CLAWS
Incarcerated in our own gloomy grey cells
28 May 2006

Bilderberg is meeting in Ottawa (Canada) June 8 to 11. The 100+ powerful politicians and corporate tycoons meet occasionally but regularly to "get on the same page" in their co-ordinated approach to global politics and financial strategies. Net mills are churning with rumours about the meeting and indications Bilderberger's main focus this time round will be on Iran and Venezuela.

http://www.mytown.ca/sanityclaws/

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
My Homepage: http://www.mytown.ca/ourvoices/
and http://www.mytown.ca/edzart/
New: http://www.mytown.ca/elections101/
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 15
From: "ranger116@webtv.net" ranger116@webtv.net
Date: Sun May 28, 2006 0:48pm(PDT)
Subject: Iran Militias Gain Foothold in Iraq laying ground for Reg.Government

Iran Militias Gain Foothold in Iraq laying ground for Reg.Government ?

"Iran" Backed Warlords and Militias are laying the groundwork for an
Islamist Regional Government in once stable "Southern Iraq" ? !

( George, Dick, Rummy ? "Iranians" are setting up a Reginal Government
in S.Iraq ? -- Are you missing something ?? )

MiamiHerald.com 05/27/2006 Iran uses militias to gain foothold in
Iraq

Address:http://www.miami.com/mld/miamiherald/14681002.htm

````````````````````````````````````````````````````
See Video on Chemtrails below
````````````````````````````````````````````````````
Very Good 9/11 website that should be Shown/Sent to All Non Believers !

Scholars for 9/11 Truth

Address:http://www.st911.org/

```````````````````````````````````````````````````
Minutemen installing border fence - U.S. Security - MSNBC.com

Address:http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/13012544/

`````````````````````````````````````````````````````

Radio New Zealand - More than 60 children reportedly held at Guantanamo
Bay

Address:http://www.radionz.co.nz/news/latest/200605281326/1e4910ac

``````````````````````````````````````````````````
Breaking News - Mysterious glowing clouds targeted by NASA
(While you are up there NASA how about a report on Chemtrails also ? !)

Address:http://www.newscientistspace.com/article/dn9228-mysterious-glowing-clouds-targeted-by-nasa.html

`````````````````````````````````````````````````````
Immigration Bill Is Worse Than You Think by Sen. Jeff Sessions

Employers of illegals given Amnesty on past taxes not collected
from illegals and not paid to IRS ! + +

Address:http://www.humaneventsonline.com/article.php?id=15165

````````````````````````````````````````````````````
George Bush Quotes Bushisms anti-Bush books George Bush books

Address:http://supak.com/bush.htm

`````````````````````````````````````````````````````
Video of - MAINSTREAM MEDIA COVERAGE OF "CHEMTRAILS"
beabernhausen@yahoo.com(Bea Bernhausen) Date: Sun, May 28, 2006,
1:59am (EDT-3) To: beabernhausen@yahoo.com

Subject: Chemtrail media coverage--(video) and more info
From Brian Holmes:

FYI: " First real mainstream media coverage in the US "

of the subject of the illegal high altitude spraying by large
military type aircraft of unknown substances - commonly referred to as
'chemtrails'.

http://chemtrails.exzani.com/Chemtrails_-_NBC4-LA_-_Toxic_Sky_-_5-24-06.wmv
Large .wmv file of 13,022KB - high speed needed?

There may be better quality recordings later but this will do for now!
** Comment from ricksgardeningtips: Great job, Paul Moyer! I
think this is as fair and balanced a piece as you're going to see on
network TV. Sure, there was the obligatory disagreeing DOE
meteorologist, and a couple of garden variety skeptics, but by the
end of the piece you were thinking, "he's right, they're doing
something." There was a questionable link between a pollen cloud and
chemtrails that I thought was going nowhere, but there were lots of
great dramatic CT shots, an excellent interview with Rosalind
Peterson, who was just great in her segment with Moyer. She covered
barium, aluminum and the upcoming bills on weather modification
succinctly. All the main points were covered, and they made a point
of saying this was not confined to a small mountain town, but believed
to be conducted everywhere. Moyers himself seemed genuinely
convinced, which sold the show for me. Others may disagree, but I
think this was a big victory - I'll be calling and emailing them
tomorrow.

Rick ** See Rosalind Peterson on Holmestead.ca:

http://www.holmestead.ca/chemtrails/rosalind.html

Please send on this information to your own contacts. Best
regards, B. -- BRIAN HOLMES, "Holmestead" 140 Thunder
Beach Road, Concession 17, Township of Tiny, RR4, Penetanguishene PO,
Ontario, Canada, L9M 2H7 Phone: 705 533-4287 Fax: 705 533-1764 Web
sites: http://www.Holmestead.ca/
http://www.librarygardentour.ca/
http://www.computersforkids.ca/

"Remember: when the state has too much power
it can commit far greater crimes than any individual."
- Baroness Helena Kennedy, QC, 2005
please read and get the word out!Yes, it's long, but CRUCIAL
Info to the masses:
<snip>
********************************
********************************
TELEVISION NEWS ALERT
(See above)

http://www.nbc4.tv/news/9155725/detail.html

Watch: "Toxic Sky?"
NBC4 TV – Los Angeles, California News Program – Tuesday, May 23,
2006
There will be a WEB report on NBC4.TV at 9:00 A.M. On May 24, 2006.
KNBC4 Television spent hours interviewing residents and experts,
Researching reports, filming jets leaving persistent contrails in
California skies, and watched video tapes of jets leaving various

Types of persistent contrails from Mendocino, Lake Sonoma, Marin, and
San Francisco counties in the northern part of the state to Los
Angeles and beyond.
KNBC learned about the Agriculture Alert below regarding U.S. Senate
Bill 517, current and ongoing weather modification programs and
Reviewed government reports on atmospheric heating and testing
Programs.

KNBC also reviewed documents regarding the Atmospheric Science
Program of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Biological &
Atmospheric Research Program. Trimethyl Aluminum and Barium
Atmospheric testing NASA documents were also provided to KNBC.
Global dimming, mysterious man-made clouds, and unusual types of
Contrails may also be addressed during this program.
In this Channel 4 News investigation, Paul Moyer, examined in depth
Claims that government agencies, private companies, states and local
Governments may be manipulating our weather.

Please spread the word that this program will air on May 23, 2006.
It is an important program for all to see because it begins to
Explore what happening to our clear blue skies and it will start a
National dialogue on the implications of atmospheric heating and
Chemical experimentation.

If NBC4.TV does not provide individual interview transcripts please
Request them. If you like this program please contact Paul Moyer at
KNBC and let them know that you would like more of this type of
Investigative programming.

AGRICULTURE ALERT – May 21, 2006
EXPERIMENTAL WEATHER MODIFICATION BILL FAST TRACKING FOR PASSAGE IN
U.S. SENATE & HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
By Rosalind Peterson
U.S. Senate Bill 517 and U.S. House
Bill 2995, a bill
That would allow experimental weather modification by artificial
Methods and implement a national weather modification policy, does
Not include agriculture or public oversight, is on the "fast track"
To be passed in 2006.
This bill is designed to implement
experimental weather
Modification. The appointed Board of Directors established by this
Bill does not include any agricultural, water, EPA, or public
Representatives, and has no provisions for Congressional, State,
County, or public oversight of their actions or expenditures.
Weather Modification may adversely
impact agricultural
Crops and water supplies. If the weather is changed in one state,
Region or county it may have severe consequences in another region,
State or county. And who is going to decide the type of weather
Modification experimentation and who it will benefit or adversely
Impact?

This experimental weather modification bill will impact residents
Across the United States not just in California. Many current and
Ongoing weather modification programs (80 listed by NOAA in 2005),
Including the one in Wyoming that is designed to increase the
Snowpack, may be diverting rainwater away from Oklahoma and Texas,
Two states that are currently fighting fires caused by a lack of
Rainfall. We have no idea what the unintended consequences of the
Wyoming action or other experimental weather modification programs
Might be now or in the future.
In addition to the experimental weather modification programs listed

By NOAA, there are both private and ongoing government sponsored
Atmospheric testing and heating programs underway in Alaska and
Across the United States. Alaska Senator Stevens recently received
$50 million in funding for Alaska's atmospheric heating program.
All of these unregulated, private, government, and public weather
Modification programs, may also have unintended synergistic effects.
Senate Bill 517 does not address these issues but intends to
Implement more experimental weather modification programs without a
National debate or public oversight.
Artificial weather modification can
impact all of us by

Reducing water supplies, changing agricultural crop production
cycles, reducing crop production, and water availability. Since most
experimental weather modification programs use chemicals released
into the atmosphere the public could be subjected increasingly toxic
or unknown substances that could adversely impact agricultural crops
and trees.
Trimethyl Aluminum (TMA) and barium are just two of the toxic
chemicals used in recent atmospheric heating and testing programs
according to NASA. The Alaska H.A.A.R.P. atmospheric heating program
may have the capability of changing the Jet Stream which could also
change our weather.
Many private weather modification
companies admit that
precipitation effects may be positive or negative. Fog dispersal
programs, using dry ice, liquid nitrogen, liquid propane or silver
iodide may improve visibility while adversely impacting Redwood Trees
along the California coast by depriving them of needed water they
derive from the fog.
The increasing use of varied chemicals
like aluminum
(coupled with increasing air pollution), can severely impact tree
health by depriving trees of water and nutrients normally absorbed
through their root systems.
The December 2005 Popular Science Magazine discussed a plan to use an
oil slick to stop hurricanes without noting the adverse environmental
impacts of the oil used to cover the ocean.
Popular Science also noted that a
private company, Dyn-O-
Mat, plans to purchase jets to drop thousands of pounds of a water
absorbing chemical powder (unknown substance), into hurricanes to
absorb moisture that may dissipate hurricanes. There is no
agriculture oversight or public hearings to determine the
consequences of this and other actions or to monitor or prevent
adverse impacts of this chemical once it falls on the surface of the
ocean or on land.
Alaska and other areas across the
United States are
beginning to feel the impacts of climate change. Enormous changes
are being seen in the declining health of native plant and tree
communities in many areas across the United States.
NASA noted in an October 2005
newsletter that
increasingly persistent contrails are "…trapping warmth in the
atmosphere and exacerbating global warming…" NASA goes on to note
that: "…Any increase in global cloud cover will contribute to long-
term changes in Earth's climate. Likewise, any change in Earth's
climate may have effects on natural resources…"
Global dimming and the persistent
contrails, that produce
man-made clouds, may have serious impacts on crop production. A
recent corn crop study in Illinois shows that cloud cover reduces
corn crop production while direct sunlight increases production. In
addition, increasing man-made clouds may reduce the effectiveness of
solar panels.
Gil Smolin, an Avian Bird Flu expert, noted on the Ron Owens Show on
KGO Radio (January 5, 2006), that the flu was spread more quickly in
the winter when there was a "lack of sunlight". Would man-made
clouds be contributing to the lack of sunlight which might cause the
Avian Bird flu to spread more quickly at other times of the year?
Experimental weather modification programs could also exacerbate this
problem by changing climate patterns, increasing man-made cloud
cover, and changing our weather and climate patterns.
Senate Bill 517 does not address any of these important issues. Its
sole purpose is to establish an experimental weather modification
policy without any agriculture or public oversight of private,
military, and government programs. Without oversight or public
hearings agriculture, our natural resources, and watersheds may be
negatively impacted. And who will be responsible to determine the
synergistic effects of these programs or pay for unintended disasters
created by this experimentation. If these programs change growing
seasons and interrupt the pollination process crop losses could be
substantial exacerbating economic losses.
Please contact all of your elected local, state and federal
officials to stop this bill in its present form. This bill needs to
have appropriate agriculture and public oversight, with public
hearings included, prior to any more experimental projects. We need
a national dialogue on this subject before more experimentation takes
place.
For more information please contact:
Rosalind Peterson
Post Office Box 499
Redwood Valley, California 95470
(707) 485-7520
E-Mail: info@californiaskywatch.com
In 1995, she became a certified U.S.D.A. Farm Service Agency Crop
Loss Adjustor working in more than ten counties throughout
California. Many crop losses throughout the State can be attributed
to weather related causes.
Rosalind has a BA degree from Sonoma State University in
Environmental Studies & Planning (ENSP), with emphasis on agriculture
and crop production.
Rosalind Peterson was born and raised on a working farm in Redwood
Valley, California. The weather was the foremost factor in
determining whether or not our tree crops produced fruit and nuts.
Between 1989 and 1993 Rosalind worked as an Agricultural Technologist
for the Mendocino County Department of Agriculture. After leaving
Mendocino County she took a position with the USDA Farm Service
Agency as a Program Assistant in Mendocino, Sonoma, and the Salinas
County Offices.
*******
The first successful protest rally against U.S. Senate Bill 517 was
held in Los Angeles, California on March 23, 2006.
The second successful educational forum and demonstration rally
opposing U.S. Senate Bill 517 was held in Phoenix, Arizona on
Saturday, April 29, 2006. The Agriculture Defense Coalition is now
moving their message east across the United States toward Washington,
D.C.
Concerned grassroots citizens are involved in this educational
protest movement to protect agriculture from unwise experimental
weather modification programs. "We, the people, simply will not
accept this reckless experimenting on our weather and are fighting
the passage of this bill in order to protect agricultural crop
production and our water supplies."
For Information on our Educational Forums Please Contact:
Bridget Conroy
Agriculture Defense Coalition
P.O. Box 54297
Phoenix Arizona 85078
(602) 404-0847
E-Mail: bcolemanconroy8@yahoo.com

Recommended Book: The Dying of the Trees, by Charles Little 1995
Associated Reference Articles:
http://www.asp.bnl.gov/ (DOE Experimental Programs – Department of
Energy)
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/medicalnews.php?newsid=36105#
http://www.usatoday.com/tech/science/2005-12-19-wyoming-cloud-seeding_x.ht
http://www.popsci.com/popsci/science/c955700641f87010vgnvcm1000004eecbccdrcrd.html
http://asd-www.larc.nasa.gov/GLOBE/Count/Oct2005/ConEdNews_p1.pdf
http://asd-www.larc.nasa.gov/GLOBE/Count/Oct2005/ConEdNews_p2.pdf
http://asd-www.larc.nasa.gov/GLOBE/Count/Oct2005/ConEdNews_p3.pdf
http://asd-www.larc.nasa.gov/GLOBE/Count/Oct2005/ConEdNews_p4.pdf
http://asd-www.larc.nasa.gov/GLOBE/Count/Oct2005/ConEdNews_p6.pdf
http://asd-www.larc.nasa.gov/GLOBE/Count/Oct2005/ConEdNews_p7.pdf
http://asd-www.larc.nasa.gov/GLOBE/Count/Oct2005/ConEdNews_p8.pdf
***************
***************
Inge's Added comment: The sentiments of outrage expressed below are
right on target. Multiple-millions of citizens are suffering ill
health, particularly respiratory problems, weakened immune systems, and
fogged minds as direct consequence of the incessant blanketing of the
planet with CHEMTRAILS during the past decade. Some areas receive a
more concentrated dose than others. Vancouver frequently seems to get
a double dose. The effect on both plant and animal health is
devastating.
Because it is a "secret" military/government project for unconscionable
purposes, there is official denial and a complete media blackout
relative to this undeniable reality. (All one has to do is look up at
the sky, open one's eyes, and have a questioning and open mind to
realize that there is something very abnormal, intentionally
manufactured, and wrong, wrong, wrong! Inexcusable!
Intolerable!.) Whether it is ill health from the chemicals being
sprayed into the atmosphere (among them aluminum and barium), or
whether it is the wacky weather patterns (from droughts to floods) that
are orchestrated through the program "Owning the Weather", the citizens
are paying the price for the experiments of mad scientists who seem
to feel that the world belongs to them, as their laboratory for mass
experimentation. WE CAN and WE MUST stop the travesty of
Chemtrails - if only we have the courage to step up to the plate, and
fight for our survival. i.h.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
from a correspondent:
Re the continuing assault of CHEMTRIALS
(Valuable contact information at end)
On Thursday, May 4th a heavy chemtrail spraying in Vancouver was
accompanied by a putrid, toxic smell in the air for miles around.
The net result was the horrible weather on Saturday and far too many
people, including my dance students, victimized by fatigue, ill health
and an inability to focus. I know I am not the only one sick and
tired of these aerosol assaults, which constitute a crime of the worst
sort against our planet and humanity.
Today Vancouver's odd weather was again chemtrail-induced from sprayings
on Tuesday.
The real conspiracy around chemtrails is the conspiracy of silence and I
hope that many of you will please join me and voice your outrage with
the media and politicians alike (listed below) over this act of
bio-terrorism. Some of you may think it pointless to challenge the
mainstream powerbrokers but to sit back and apathetically surrender like
sheeple will surely reap even less. It takes only a few minutes to
leave a message on a comment line, and the more voices that are heard,
the more eyes that will be opened.
Please print up the below info, pass it on - and bombard the "
authorities" , media etc. every time we are assaulted. Make some
calls - even 1 or 2 is better than nothing; Ask for a meeting with
your M.P; Send an e-mail; Get angry, get active . .
.Together lets make this an issue . . .
As the saying goes, " All it takes for evil to triumph is for good
people to do nothing."
If you want updates on info like U.S. Bill S517 check out
www.willthomas.net &/or see www.carnicom.com ,
www.chembusters.us etc.
Remember you don't have to be a chemtrail expert to know that chemtrails
are real and wrong! DEAD WRONG!
( Please encourage more progressive media/politicians to break the code
of silence)
R.E.

For All Ottawa numbers below, dial toll free 1-866-599-4999
and ask for specific office.

Prime Minister Harper
Minister of Environment : R. Ambrose
Minister of Transportation : L. Canon
&am
p;nb sp;
Environment Canada: 1-800-668-6767

CBC 1 - 800 -565 -1422
CTV - 604-608-2868 ( comment line or newsroom)
Global TV -604 - 420-2288 ( comment line )
Weather Network- 604-433-5590
Vancouver Sun - 604-605-2180 / 604-605-2445
pbucci@pgn.canwest.com
Georgia Straight - 604 - 730 - 7000 (ask for editor's voice mail )
c_smith@straight.com
Globe & Mail - wstueck@globeandmail.ca
Common Ground -604-733-2215 - editor@commonground.ca
Shared Vision- 604-733-5062 - editor@shared-vision.com

WHITE HOUSE COMMENT LINE: 202-456-1111

Ministry of Health in Ottawa ( Minister T. Clement )
1-866-599-4999

Some BC MPs :Van numbers -prefix 604

Hedy Fry - fryh@parl.gc.ca 666-0135 Van.
Centre
Ujjal Dosanijh -dosanj.u@parl.gc.ca 775-5323
Van. South
Stephen Owen - owens1@parl.gc.ca 664-9220 Van.
Quadra
David Emerson - emers.d@parl.gc.ca 775-6263
fraudulently elected
Bill Siksay - siksay.b@parl.gc.ca 219-8863
Burnaby -Douglas
Libby Davies - daviel@parl.gc.ca 775-5800
Van.East
Talk is cheap. Use Yahoo! Messenger to make PC-to-Phone calls. Great
rates starting at 1¢/min.

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 16
From: "jewish_from_brooklyn" jewish_from_brooklyn@yahoo.com
Date: Sun May 28, 2006 1:45pm(PDT)
Subject: Re: Great New Racial Blogs!

--- In 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com, mann david <dmann51@...> wrote:
>
> Great !! JUST WHAT WE NEED - Racist SLIM BALLS like
> yourself interjecting in this vital work of exposing
> the 9-11 conspiracy - just which "race" is responsible
> for WAR and 9-11.

Arabs are getting murdered with US taxpayer dollars.

This is turning out to be a war of racial genocide against the Sunni Arabs.

I would like to know who_exactly is behind all of this carnage and who_exactly
is benefitting from it.

Yaacov.

> You're so far off base (and off the
> subject), I would suggest that you FIND ANOTHER LIST
> TO POST ON !!
>
> --- Susan Enders <senders_1975@...> wrote:
>
> >
> > http://nwtrilogy.blogspot.com
> >
> > http://covingtonfiction.blogspot.com
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------
> > Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Make PC-to-Phone Calls
> > to the US (and 30+ countries) for 2¢/min or less.
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 17
From: "jewish_from_brooklyn" jewish_from_brooklyn@yahoo.com
Date: Sun May 28, 2006 2:00pm(PDT)
Subject: Killing Arabs and burning down their cities

Look at what we've done to those poor Arabs.

Is this really about fighting "terrorism" ... or is this really about killing and
destroying the enemies of Israel ?

Yaacov.

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 18
From: "Naveed" flanker12k@yahoo.com
Date: Sun May 28, 2006 3:13pm(PDT)
Subject: Re: Fw: NYT (1993): FBI allowed the WTC bombing to happen

FBI gave a million dollars and furnished the explosives to the ex-exgyptian army officer and told him to carry out the "drill"

john antecif was his name the FBI regional chief

In the beginning of a change the patriot is a scarce man, and brave, and hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a patriot.
- Notebook, 1904

http://www.fightthenwo.org/

----- Original Message ----
From: Ronald <bleier.r@gmail.com>
To: ronald.bleier@gmail.com
Sent: Sunday, May 28, 2006 12:48:36 PM
Subject: [911TruthAction] Fw: NYT (1993): FBI allowed the WTC bombing to happen

THE NEW YORK TIMES
* * * * *
Thursday October 28, 1993 Page A1
"Tapes Depict Proposal to Thwart
Bomb Used in Trade Center Blast"
By Ralph Blumenthal
Law-enforcement officials were told that terrorists were building
a bomb that was eventually used to blow up the World Trade Center,
and they planned to thwart the plotters by secretly substituting
harmless powder for the explosives, an informer said after
the blast.
The informer was to have helped the plotters build the bomb
and supply the fake powder, but the plan was called off by
an F.B.I. supervisor who had other ideas about how the informer,
Emad Salem, should be used, the informer said.
The account, which is given in the transcript of hundreds of
hours of tape recordings that Mr. Salem secretly made of his
talks with law-enforcement agents, portrays the authorities as
being in a far better position than previously known to foil
the February 26th bombing of New York City's tallest towers.
The explosion left six people dead, more than a thousand people
injured, and damages in excess of half-a-billion dollars.
Four men are now on trial in Manhattan Federal Court
[on charges of involvement] in that attack.
Mr. Salem, a 43-year-old former Egyptian Army officer, was used
by the Government [of the United States] to penetrate a circle
of Muslim extremists who are now charged in two bombing cases:
the World Trade Center attack, and a foiled plot to destroy
the United Nations, the Hudson River tunnels, and other
New York City landmarks. He is the crucial witness in the
second bombing case, but his work for the Government was
erratic, and for months before the World Trade Center blast,
he was feuding with the F.B.I.
Supervisor `Messed It Up'
After the bombing, he resumed his undercover work. In an
undated transcript of a conversation from that period,
Mr. Salem recounts a talk he had had earlier with an agent
about an unnamed F.B.I. supervisor who, he said,
"came and messed it up."
"He requested to meet me in the hotel,"
Mr. Salem says of the supervisor.
"He requested to make me to testify, and if he didn't
push for that, we'll be going building the bomb with
a phony powder, and grabbing the people who was
involved in it. But since you, we didn't do that."
The transcript quotes Mr. Salem as saying that he wanted to
complain to F.B.I. Headquarters in Washington about the
Bureau's failure to stop the bombing, but was dissuaded by
an agent identified as John Anticev.
Mr. Salem said Mr. Anticev had told him,
"He said, I don't think that the New York people would
like the things out of the New York Office to go to
Washington, D.C."
Another agent, identified as Nancy Floyd, does not dispute
Mr. Salem's account, but rather, appears to agree with it,
saying of the `New York people':
"Well, of course not, because they don't want to
get their butts chewed."

The result of the explosion:
6 civilians killed Over 1,000 injured 105 firefighters injured - 5 admitted to local hospitals reinforced floors almost 30 inches think blasted away on 3 levels below grade, plus a concourse level floor, leaving a crater about 150 feet in diameter at it's largest point. On the B1 level, the operations control center of the Port Authority Police Department (and the fire command station forthe complex) was heavily damaged and rendered out of service. On the B2 level, various walls of elevator shafts and freshair plenums severely damaged, allowing smoke to enter and rise through the cores of both towers. Numerous concrete walls destroyed or damaged. 200,000 cubic feet of water poured into the lowest grade from damaged refrigeration unit supplies (from the Hudson River), sewer lines, fresh domestic water lines, steam pipes, and condensate return. Water 1.5 feet deep across the B6 level. 124 parked cars destroyed, 102 damaged. Partition walls blown out onto PATH train mezzanine.
Numerous telephone conduits collapsed from ceiling onto cars (but phone service was not cut, miraculously). Fire alarm and public address systems out of service. Elevators out of service. Water cooled emergency generators shut down due to overheating when their water supply was cut. This disabled the emergency lighting. Sprinklers & standpipes out of service. 2,500 tons of rubble removed. Clean up effort involved 2,700 workers per day, plus a total of 160,000 gallons of cleaning fluid and 200,00 gallons of detergent. Restoration cost: $250,000,000.

SPONSORED LINKS United state government grant United state military United state patent
United state citizenship United state coin Trademark united state

YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

Visit your group "911TruthAction" on the web.

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
911TruthAction-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 19
From: "Naveed" flanker12k@yahoo.com
Date: Sun May 28, 2006 3:28pm(PDT)
Subject: Re: Well oh my golly my GOSH!

dude, this is fuel for everyone elses fires, you just happened to dump a tanker truck!

they know this is beyond bush right?

Loose change does an excellent job covering the firefighters testimony of bombs in the buildings.

In the beginning of a change the patriot is a scarce man, and brave, and hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a patriot.
- Notebook, 1904

http://www.fightthenwo.org/

----- Original Message ----
From: DOUGLAS CLARK <bushsept11mastermind@yahoo.com>
To: 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, May 28, 2006 1:11:41 PM
Subject: Re: [911TruthAction] Well oh my golly my GOSH!

BOAST...BRAG...AND MAY "GOD" BLESS YOUR EFFORTS!!

Kevin Hammond <sir_oglaigh@yahoo.com> wrote:
Awe geee shux!

Jamie Welsh <jamie@xenic.com> wrote:
it's ok boast away kevin! you make me proud.
-jamie

On May 28, 2006, at 10:06 AM, Kevin Lee Hammond wrote:

Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Make PC-to-Phone Calls to the US (and 30+ countries) for 2¢/min or less.

SPONSORED LINKS United state army United state grant United state government grant
United state patent United state flag United state citizenship

YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

Saoirse go deo! www.fightthenwo.org

Sneak preview the all-new Yahoo.com. It's not radically different. Just radically better.

SPONSORED LINKS United state grant United state patent United state flag
Trademark united state United state coin United state citizenship

How low will we go? Check out Yahoo! Messengers low PC-to-Phone call rates.

SPONSORED LINKS United state flag United state military United state government grant
Trademark united state United state coin United state army

YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

Message 20
From: "Joe Stokes" joestokes@sbcglobal.net
Date: Sun May 28, 2006 7:20pm(PDT)
Subject: Required Reading

REQUIRED READING FOR BUSH SUPPORTERS!
The George W. Bush Administration:
A Lesson for Bush Supporters
Editor, TvNewsLIES.org – February 2006
Click here for printable pdf version of this article. UPDATED: 20-March-2006 - Click here for more information.
The facts and allegations contained in this article are not disputed, are easily verified and are documented by the subjects in their own words. I am writing this not to tell you about some secret on to which I have stumbled, rather to explain the well defined and verifiable information that has been kept out of the public discourse by the American corporate news media. Perhaps this will serve as a prime example of how much media deception takes place in our nation. I ask you not to accept what you read in this article as truth, and I ask you not to dismiss it as an untruth, I ask you to research the claims for yourself. The information is out there and nobody is denying the claims made in this article. They are simply refusing to discuss them.
Please, don’t trust me…test me. – Jesse – Editor, TvNewsLIES.org

1. A FICTIONAL TALE OF HORROR
If you wanted to hire a child daycare professional to look after your child, it seems reasonable that you would want to know something about that person’s background. Perhaps you would check into his or her criminal history to see if there was a record of sexual offense or violence towards children. Perhaps you would check the person’s religious background to make certain he is not involved in any bizarre religious practice such as child or animal sacrifice. You surely would conduct a thorough and painstaking pursuit of all available information about the applicant.
By performing your due diligence, you would be acting in the best interest of your child; you would be acting as a fully responsible parent; and you would be ensuring that the person you hire is exactly what he or she purports to be.
Now, let’s assume that during your investigation you uncover nothing really suspicious about the person at all. All you find out is that the name of the applicant’s religion is very similar to your own. In fact, because the name is “Neo-Christianity” or “Neo-Judaism,” you feel quite comfortable with the term. After all, it sounds so familiar and suggests a close connection to your own belief system.
What if you accept this discovery and feel quite safe with the presumptions you made – even though you never took a moment to research the newly identified religion?
And what if you made a dreadful and irreparable mistake?
Let’s say you then are confident enough in the applicant to hire him to care for your child. But then one day your worst nightmare becomes a reality. You come home to find your child slaughtered and his blood splattered all over your home. And there, in the middle of the room is your new hired day care professional on his knees, praying to an unfamiliar God!
You bury your child and you live with the terrible knowledge that you can never bring your child back to life. The day care worker is arrested, and during the trial you find out that the person you hired to protect your child was participating in a ritual demanded by the precepts of his religion.
You learn that it was his religious duty to lure you into trusting him so that he could have access to your child. You discover, far too late, that your similar sounding religions are indeed nothing alike. You now deeply regret not listening to the people who warned you about the members of that particular religion. You are ashamed that you once labeled them “Neo-Christian (or Neo-Jewish) bashers” and trusted your own instincts instead. You are horrified that you refused to look at the documents about this strange religion that those “Neo-Whatever bashers” tried to share with you.
You suddenly realize that the people who tried so hard to warn you knew something you didn’t. They were actually looking out for your best interests and you would not listen. You found that out too late; far, far too late.
2. A REALITY BASED TALE OF HORROR
But first, a question to the people who support the Bush administration and their policies: Have you done your due diligence to become a well informed citizen of the United States or are you simply following the advice of a handful of people who told you to trust them? Think about it.
From here on, when I refer to “Bush” I also refer to the people who comprise his administration, the people who have defined the policies of his administration and the people who have led day to day operations and activities within his administration. For the sake of simplicity I may speak of these people by referring to the symbol of their collective deeds: George W. Bush.
I have a great deal of experience dealing with Bush supporters and with his opponents. I find that supporters and detractors of Bush often have something very interesting in common: both groups know very little about the character, principles and philosophy of the people about whom they have formed an opinion.
Let’s begin by taking a closer look at two groups that make up the Bush administration. Surely, some people in the Bush White House fall outside these groups and in most cases merely serve as window dressing for the administration. They yield little power and have no significant influence but often, as in the case of former Secretary of State Colin Powell, provide a convenient aura of legitimacy.
Let us, then, concentrate on the two groups that play an active and powerful role in the Bush administration.
Group 1: The Neocons – The Policy Makers of the Administration
We have heard the term “Neocon” for the past five years. We have been told time and time again that the bulk of key policy makers in the Bush administration are Neo-Conservatives yet we never hear much about what Neocons believe in nor do we hear anything about their principles.
I really believe that is in everybody’s best interest to stop using labels as a general reference to political groups unless we know what the label means. The order of the day, however, is to do just that: to label someone a ‘conservative’ or a “commie” or a “liberal” without the slightest knowledge of the basic principles of conservatism or communism or liberalism.
Do the name callers have a specific doctrine or platform in mind when they use a political designation as a derogatory term? Most probably, they do not. Perhaps, if they looked up the words they hurled so easily, they might be very surprised to discover how ignorant they were of the principles involved.
On the other hand, believing a name has a positive connotation can be a serious mistake as well. We hear the term ‘Neocon’ tossed around quite easily nowadays by people who have no clue as to what it means. The term is far too often embraced for its adoption of the term ‘conservative,” and presumed to share the values of the American right. However, if people on the right, - true conservatives, took the time to understand the philosophy of Neo-Conservatism, they might be terribly disappointed.
Indeed, Neo-Conservatism bears little resemblance to traditional Conservatism. As a matter of fact the naming of the ideology may have been a strategic move intended on making Republicans and Conservatives feel comfortable with the term. It might have served to allay the suspicion or curiosity of those who should have taken a much closer look into what Neocons are all about.
There is no question that there is a frighteningly powerful Neo-Conservative influence over American foreign policy in this administration. That is an undeniable reality. However, while members of the media such as Chris Matthews use the term on a fairly regular basis, they never explain what Neo-Conservatism is all about.
To counter that, let’s look at some of the basic principles of Neo-Conservatism:
The godfather of the Neocon movement was an intellectual disciple of Machiavelli named Leo Strauss. Straus was a German Zionist who immigrated to the US in the 1930s and mentored people like William Kristol and Paul Wolfowitz while advocating his philosophy of a dog-eat-dog world.
In essence, the Straussian philosophy and teachings are now known as Neo-Conservatism. Below are some of the more interesting and perhaps surprising or even disturbing aspects of Neo-Conservatism as taught by Strauss:

Nations cannot consider collective action and multilateralism unless it is 100 percent in line with their own selfish interests
Strong leadership is required
Military power is essential
Leadership ought not be encumbered by human rights discourse or a moral conscience but nonetheless must "appear" to advocate such ideas.
Rulers need not observe the laws they impose on the ruled.
A ruler can cheat and lie and do all sorts of things but should at all time maintain the outside appearance of adherence to human rights and caring for people.
Leaders can use religion as one of many tools to ensure the nation keeps on course as formulated.
Outside threats help ensure social cohesion under domestic leadership
Altruism, environmental protection, justice etc, are not the concern of governments and ruling elites. They have no part to play in the equation of power
Strauss questioned how, and to what extent, freedom and excellence can coexist.
Strauss was very pre-occupied with secrecy because he was convinced that the truth is too harsh for any society to bear; and that the truth-bearers are likely to be persecuted by society, especially a liberal society because liberal democracy is about as far as one can get from the truth as Strauss understood it.
Secular society is the worst possible thing, because it leads to individualism, liberalism, and relativism, precisely those traits that may promote dissent that in turn could dangerously weaken society's ability to cope with external threats
Nazism was a nihilistic reaction to the ungodly and liberal nature of the Weimar Republic.
Religion should impose moral law on the masses who would otherwise be out of control.
Machiavelli’s political doctrine serves as the foundation of Neo-Conservatism and it denies the relevance of morality in political affairs. It states that that craft and deceit are justified in pursuing and maintaining political power. It implies that when it comes to achieving or maintaining power the end justifies the means. This is essentially the core of Machiavellianism and serves as the foundation for Neo-Conservatism: The priority for the power holder is to keep the security of the state regardless of the morality of the means. Machiavelli discusses frankly, the necessity of cruel actions to keep power. He was in the business of power preservation not piety. According to the originator of Neo-Conservative ideology the leader of the state must stick to the good so long as he can, but, being compelled by necessity, he must be ready to take the way of the evil.
Let me repeat this last principle of Neo-Conservatism because it plays into the “believability factor” when considering claims made by people who accuse the Bush administration of unconscionable actions: “The leader of the state must stick to the good so long as he can, but, being compelled by necessity, he must be ready to take the way of the evil.” These people believe that evil is acceptable and necessary at times!
A question for Bush backers: Are these the principles and ideals that you chose to support when you aligned yourself with the Bush administration? I am not discussing a conspiracy theory here. We have established clearly and undeniably that George W. Bush has assembled an administration founded on Neo-Conservative principles and a Neo-Conservative agenda. What I have outlined here are the beliefs and philosophies of the Neo-Conservatives within the administration. You can verify this on your own. I implore you to do so and I wish you had done so several years ago, prior to September 11th 2001.
Let’s move on.
Group 2: The Operatives
Fact: While Congress absconded into its many periods of recess, and under the cooperative cloak of the American corporate media, George W. Bush welcomed back into government an alarming array of individuals who have had decades of experience in undermining the democratic processes of government at its highest levels.
I am not simply talking about people who have been associated with political actions with which I strongly disagree. I am talking about people involved in serious criminal conspiracies conducted at the top echelons of our government. I am talking about convicted felons who have been personally appointed by George W. Bush to important and powerful positions without Congressional consent. I am talking about a laundry list of people who were at some time convicted of, tried for or associated with one of the biggest criminal operations ever conducted by an American administration.
While well meaning and decent Bush supporters rejoiced in the fact that they no longer had as president a man who would lie about his sex life, they did not know that their current leader was filling high level positions with people who had decades of experience subverting the democratic process and running criminal operations as part of a huge, criminal, government-operated conspiracy. Yes, the Iran-Contra gang came back to Washington and our corporate media did not have time to share this information with the American people.
The line-up is pretty impressive: John Poindexter, Elliot Abrams, Otto Reich, John Negroponte, and Rogelio Pardo-Maurer. These men were all rewarded with powerful jobs in the Bush government for their felonious and murderous backgrounds. You don’t remember what they did or why they were convicted of anything? Look them up folks; don’t trust me to fill in the blanks. Look them up and wonder why these appointments didn’t make the morning headlines when they occurred.
Ask yourself why you didn’t know that your president appointed felons and their associates to very high level positions within your government? Does this bother you at all? Is this what you thought you voted for…twice?
In Perspective
Let’s put this information into perspective. We have an administration that is largely controlled by a group that uses a fairly benign sounding name. Neo-Conservatism sounds very much like an acceptable and ethical political ideology. The principles involved in this group, however are the architects and power brokers of the failed and war mongering foreign policy of the Bush administration: the policy that has us now mired in Iraq, poised to strike Iran and Syria, and dead broke to boot.
Make no mistake. This is not a conservative group of politicos with an upgraded title. This is, in fact, a group that is extremely, not slightly reactionary. They are, also extremely, not slightly, dangerous. They contradict almost every concepts Americans associate with a democratic republic and they do not adhere to the restrictions and boundaries defined by the US Constitution.
The philosophy of the current administration, as defined by the doctrine of the Neocons themselves and those of their mentors, has much more in common with Fascist dictators such as Adolph Hitler and Josef Stalin. This is not a liberal rant, it is an accurate assessment based on the undisputed, fully documented and openly admitted principles of the people who currently comprise the George W. Bush administration. It is not in their best interest to let you know this, but at the same time they do not hide this information from you. Look it up. The media have done a yeoman’s job of hiding this information from you. It’s your turn to do the work.
Keep in mind that the Neo-Con philosophy states that no rules apply when it comes to achieving power, even lying and cheating. And then consider the actions of the Bush administration in every single policy it has pursued – from election results to war, from the environment to the economy. They set the rules, they do as they please. Anything goes.
Look around at all the lies, the deception and the fraud and welcome in the New World order that answers to no one – no one at all.
At this very minute, the people who are in charge of the government of the United States of America believe that no rules apply to them. They believe that religion can be used to control society and that human rights do not apply to them. They do not have to follow the laws that all other citizens must respect, and they openly believe that evil is acceptable if deemed necessary to achieve their goals.
Add to the mix the extraordinary power now in the hands of people with decades of experience in subverting the law and the democratic process, and in conducting massive criminal conspiracies from inside the government.
Put it all together and you have an administration operating at the greatest levels of secrecy of any government in history, and run by people whose goals and beliefs have never been explained to the public whose interests they are supposedly serving.
I have yet to come across a Bush supporter who is aware of the underlying philosophy of the Neocons who direct the policies of the current administration. I have yet to meet one supporter who has any clue as to the extent that our democracy and Constitution have been compromised by these powerful and ruthless ideologues.
Still I believe that if they did their homework and examined the information that is NOT reported by our broadcast media but is nonetheless available, even present day Bush supporters would be very disturbed and most probably horrified.
And if they are, there is still time to take back the nation. There is still time for all Americans to take their patriotic responsibilities seriously. There is still time for all Americans who still back this President to understand what they have been supporting.
It is not possible for anyone to defend the goals of Neo-Conservatives and still claim to be an American. It is a contradiction of terms.
The fictional parents in the introduction to this article made a tragic mistake. They assumed it was not necessary to fully investigate the person to whom they entrusted the welfare of their child. Similarly, many real people in this nation have made a terrible and irretrievable error.
Millions of Americans entrusted their well being and the well being of their nation to an administration they accepted at face value. They bought into the promotions and the mantras, and the lies and the deceits. They did not ask the questions and they believed what they were told.
As in the fictional story, the damage is done and there is no going back. But, in real life there is always a tomorrow. There has to be a moment in which each and every person who has refused to do so in the past takes the time to find out who is running this country, and to understand where these totally evil men are taking us all.
For your own sake, look them up. For your own sake, understand who is at the helm of this sinking ship. For your own sake, believe what the Neocons in power proudly and openly admit on their own web site.
For your own sake, wake up before they take us all into their distorted fantasy world of military global domination. Or, sit back and watch the end of the world as we know it. It’s your choice. Go for it.
Click here for printable pdf version of this article.
Written as a patriot by Jesse, Editor, TvNewsLIES.org
Press inquiries welcomed.
Available for speaking engagements: Jesse@tvnewslies.org
0){ dc.write(''); date_ob.setTime(date_ob.getTime()+43200000); dc.cookie='he=llo; path=/; expires='+ date_ob.toGMTString();} // -->

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 21
From: "Joe Stokes" joestokes@sbcglobal.net
Date: Sun May 28, 2006 7:29pm(PDT)
Subject: http://www.radicalruss.net/bushmap/200605.php

http://www.radicalruss.net/bushmap/200605.php

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 22
From: "Kevin Hammond" sir_oglaigh@yahoo.com
Date: Sun May 28, 2006 7:34pm(PDT)
Subject: Re: Well oh my golly my GOSH!

Hopefully they will learn that. In regards to the boss, well, I was out of Loose CXhange so loaned him a copy of Martial Law and one of 9 11 the Greatest Lie Ever Sold by Anthony Hilder! That is one of my favorites! Everyone on this group should try to see that one! Also the last ten minutes of 911 the great illusion {Endgame of the Illuminati is all about the nwo and some quotes of Kissenger, rockefeller and that gang of vermin.
And the thing that I like about Don paul And Jim Hoffman's vid is that Don names Cheney and bushy LAST as the main culprits and of the least significance.
Kevin.
One of the names that he names is Peter G. Peterson of the fed, the blackstone group, and the cfr!
www.fightthenwo.org

Naveed <flanker12k@yahoo.com> wrote:

dude, this is fuel for everyone elses fires, you just happened to dump a tanker truck!

they know this is beyond bush right?

Loose change does an excellent job covering the firefighters testimony of bombs in the buildings.

In the beginning of a change the patriot is a scarce man, and brave, and hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a patriot.
- Notebook, 1904

http://www.fightthenwo.org/

BOAST...BRAG...AND MAY "GOD" BLESS YOUR EFFORTS!!

Kevin Hammond <sir_oglaigh@yahoo.com> wrote: Awe geee shux!

Jamie Welsh <jamie@xenic.com> wrote: it's ok boast away kevin! you make me proud.
-jamie

On May 28, 2006, at 10:06 AM, Kevin Lee Hammond wrote:

---------------------------------
Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Make PC-to-Phone Calls to the US (and 30+ countries) for 2¢/min or less.

---------------------------------

Saoirse go deo! www.fightthenwo.org
---------------------------------
Sneak preview the all-new Yahoo.com. It's not radically different. Just radically better.

SPONSORED LINKS
United state grant United state patent United state flag Trademark united state United state coin United state citizenship

PLEASE SPREAD THE WORD ABOUT MY WEBSITE (911again.tripod.com) TO OTHER GROUPS AND INDIVIDUALS.

AS ALWAYS, THE BEST OF HEALTH AND TIMES TO YOU AND YOURS.

DOUGLAS CLARK
7320 HERMITAGE ST
PITTSBURGH PA 15208

---------------------------------
How low will we go? Check out Yahoo! Messengers low PC-to-Phone call rates.

SPONSORED LINKS
United state flag United state military United state government grant Trademark united state United state coin United state army

---------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

---------------------------------

SPONSORED LINKS
Trademark united state United state military United state coin United state citizenship United state patent United state army

---------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

---------------------------------

Saoirse go deo! www.fightthenwo.org

---------------------------------
Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Make PC-to-Phone Calls to the US (and 30+ countries) for 2¢/min or less.
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 23
From: "Kevin Hammond" sir_oglaigh@yahoo.com
Date: Sun May 28, 2006 8:01pm(PDT)
Subject: Re: Fw: NYT (1993): FBI allowed the WTC bombing to happen

Clinton, Who was and IS a dope dealing partner with bush sr and Larry Silverschmuck I mean Silverstein had FOUR MAJOR events during his admin. 3 of them false flag type stuff. First was waco which i guess really technically was not a false flag, second was the 93 bombing which by the way was covered up by none other than Fitzgerald who is supposedly prosecuting the neocons. third was OK city which was 100 PERCENT an INSIDE JOB to further the agenda of the Illuminati/NWO and anhilate parts of the bill of RIGHTS and constitution, And last but not least was yugoslavia and the dumping of TONS of depleted uranium in the Balkans which has caused THOUSANDS of cases of cancer in that region. is he a slithering, slimy satanic culprit?! I think so.
Kevin

Naveed <flanker12k@yahoo.com> wrote:

FBI gave a million dollars and furnished the explosives to the ex-exgyptian army officer and told him to carry out the "drill"

john antecif was his name the FBI regional chief

In the beginning of a change the patriot is a scarce man, and brave, and hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a patriot.
- Notebook, 1904

http://www.fightthenwo.org/

Ralph Schoenman was recently in NYC for some lectures, parts of which were broadcast on local, soon to be gone, community access cable. In connection with false flag operations, Schoenman mentioned the 1993 WTC bombing and gave the documentation regarding the Times account which blew the whistle on the FBI operation. So the truth comes out in plain sight (excuse the pun), but it doesn't matter, since it's never repeated and certainly not part of the official story, the only story that is allowed. In his lecture Schoenman laid out his theory that the Blind Sheik was brought in to this country against Egypt's protests to serve as a patsy in these false flag operations and was aided by the CIA while in Egypt as part of a larger operation to destabilize secular Arab governments.
This reminder from 1993 brings up again the question of Clinton's involvement in these shadow operations. This false flag operation was intended to jump start the war against the Muslim community in the CIA/FBI creation of an Islamic villain and permanent war that is their mission. Did Clinton know in advance? After the incident, what effort if any did he make to get to the bottom of it? In all likelihood, the best that can be said is that he kept a hands off approach. --Ronald The FBI allowed the 1993
WTC bombing to happen
---------------------------------
THE NEW YORK TIMES
* * * * *
Thursday October 28, 1993 Page A1
"Tapes Depict Proposal to Thwart
Bomb Used in Trade Center Blast"
By Ralph Blumenthal
Law-enforcement officials were told that terrorists were building
a bomb that was eventually used to blow up the World Trade Center,
and they planned to thwart the plotters by secretly substituting
harmless powder for the explosives, an informer said after
the blast.
The informer was to have helped the plotters build the bomb
and supply the fake powder, but the plan was called off by
an F.B.I. supervisor who had other ideas about how the informer,
Emad Salem, should be used, the informer said.
The account, which is given in the transcript of hundreds of
hours of tape recordings that Mr. Salem secretly made of his
talks with law-enforcement agents, portrays the authorities as
being in a far better position than previously known to foil
the February 26th bombing of New York City's tallest towers.
The explosion left six people dead, more than a thousand people
injured, and damages in excess of half-a-billion dollars.
Four men are now on trial in Manhattan Federal Court
[on charges of involvement] in that attack.
Mr. Salem, a 43-year-old former Egyptian Army officer, was used
by the Government [of the United States] to penetrate a circle
of Muslim extremists who are now charged in two bombing cases:
the World Trade Center attack, and a foiled plot to destroy
the United Nations, the Hudson River tunnels, and other
New York City landmarks. He is the crucial witness in the
second bombing case, but his work for the Government was
erratic, and for months before the World Trade Center blast,
he was feuding with the F.B.I.
Supervisor `Messed It Up'
After the bombing, he resumed his undercover work. In an
undated transcript of a conversation from that period,
Mr. Salem recounts a talk he had had earlier with an agent
about an unnamed F.B.I. supervisor who, he said,
"came and messed it up."
"He requested to meet me in the hotel,"
Mr. Salem says of the supervisor.
"He requested to make me to testify, and if he didn't
push for that, we'll be going building the bomb with
a phony powder, and grabbing the people who was
involved in it. But since you, we didn't do that."
The transcript quotes Mr. Salem as saying that he wanted to
complain to F.B.I. Headquarters in Washington about the
Bureau's failure to stop the bombing, but was dissuaded by
an agent identified as John Anticev.
Mr. Salem said Mr. Anticev had told him,
"He said, I don't think that the New York people would
like the things out of the New York Office to go to
Washington, D.C."
Another agent, identified as Nancy Floyd, does not dispute
Mr. Salem's account, but rather, appears to agree with it,
saying of the `New York people':
"Well, of course not, because they don't want to
get their butts chewed."

---------------------------------
The result of the explosion:
6 civilians killed Over 1,000 injured 105 firefighters injured - 5 admitted to local hospitals reinforced floors almost 30 inches think blasted away on 3 levels below grade, plus a concourse level floor, leaving a crater about 150 feet in diameter at it's largest point. On the B1 level, the operations control center of the Port Authority Police Department (and the fire command station forthe complex) was heavily damaged and rendered out of service. On the B2 level, various walls of elevator shafts and freshair plenums severely damaged, allowing smoke to enter and rise through the cores of both towers. Numerous concrete walls destroyed or damaged. 200,000 cubic feet of water poured into the lowest grade from damaged refrigeration unit supplies (from the Hudson River), sewer lines, fresh domestic water lines, steam pipes, and condensate return. Water 1.5 feet deep across the B6 level. 124 parked cars destroyed, 102 damaged. Partition walls blown out onto PATH train
mezzanine. Numerous telephone conduits collapsed from ceiling onto cars (but phone service was not cut, miraculously). Fire alarm and public address systems out of service. Elevators out of service. Water cooled emergency generators shut down due to overheating when their water supply was cut. This disabled the emergency lighting. Sprinklers & standpipes out of service. 2,500 tons of rubble removed. Clean up effort involved 2,700 workers per day, plus a total of 160,000 gallons of cleaning fluid and 200,00 gallons of detergent. Restoration cost: $250,000,000.

SPONSORED LINKS
United state government grant United state military United state patent United state citizenship United state coin Trademark united state

---------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

---------------------------------

SPONSORED LINKS
United state army United state citizenship Trademark united state United state patent United state military United state grant

---------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

---------------------------------

Saoirse go deo! www.fightthenwo.org

---------------------------------
Blab-away for as little as 1¢/min. Make PC-to-Phone Calls using Yahoo! Messenger with Voice.
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 24
From: "Kevin Hammond" sir_oglaigh@yahoo.com
Date: Sun May 28, 2006 8:13pm(PDT)
Subject: Re: Killing Arabs and burning down their cities

I would be inclined Sir, To say that it is the latter of the 2 that you mentioned.
Kevin

jewish_from_brooklyn <jewish_from_brooklyn@yahoo.com> wrote:

Look at what we've done to those poor Arabs.

Is this really about fighting "terrorism" ... or is this really about killing and
destroying the enemies of Israel ?

Yaacov.

SPONSORED LINKS
United state patent Trademark united state United state citizenship United state military United state government grant United state army

---------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

---------------------------------

Message 25
From: "Kevin Hammond" sir_oglaigh@yahoo.com
Date: Sun May 28, 2006 8:25pm(PDT)
Subject: Re: Well oh my golly my GOSH!

It just starts with being brave enough to approach that first stranger. Each and every time it gets just a little bit easier. For me, It started by giving out flyers and posing them on telephone poles and bus stops and such. Also putting them into the literature receptacles on public transit here in san Francisco. i also wear a buttoneverywhere that I go that says 9 11 was an inside job. the minute that I catch someone looking at it I am o em like flys on shit.
I REALLY like it when I get em on the train in the tunnel and they cant get away and I have so to speak a captive audience.
Kevin

Jarrett Smith <Jarret.Smith@ntlworld.com> wrote:

Me too, sounds like you're doing a great job.

Jarrett

> > me and asked if I knew where he could get a copy of loose change!

> > Could it be perhaps because I have given a copy to each of my co-
> > workers and made sure that they watched it?! Could it be also,
> > That I have woken up damn near every shop owner and worker on the
> > block where I work?! With copies of not only Loose Change, but
> > also of martial Law and other such dvds!. One woman in turn took
> > them to her church and woke up her entire congregation! Please do

> > not take this as boasting bu t as just informing you all of the
> > fact that folks are WAKING UP!
> >
> > Kevin
> > www.fightthenwo.org
> >
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Make PC-to-Phone Calls to the US (and

> > 30+ countries) for 2¢/min or less.
> >
> > SPONSORED LINKS
> > United state army United state grant United state
government grant
> > United state patent United state flag United state citizenship
> >
> > YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
> >
> > Visit your group "911TruthAction" on the web.
> >
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > 911TruthAction-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service.
> >
> >
>

SPONSORED LINKS
United state military United state citizenship United state patent United state coin Trademark united state United state flag

---------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

---------------------------------

Saoirse go deo! www.fightthenwo.org

---------------------------------
Feel free to call! Free PC-to-PC calls. Low rates on PC-to-Phone. Get Yahoo! Messenger with Voice
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/911TruthAction/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
911TruthAction-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Discussion about 09/11/2001

Monday, May 29, 2006

[911TruthAction] Digest Number 1309

No comments:

About Me

Last posts