Tuesday, May 30, 2006

[911InsideJobbers] Re: That's all folks. Case solved.

"It's a fact that flight 175's target spot was so precise that
it mainly by passed the centre core of the south tower and at the same
time was breaking up as it went through. That too was so precise. The
breaking up was so precise to have caused it to totally disappear
inside the building.".......
again...... check out the wording...
"... so precise to have caused it to totally DISAPPEAR inside the
building...
====
http://thewebfairy.com/911/slideshow/noplane2/

Like magic !!!!
Why... it must be that magical nano-technology that causes it to just
miraculously "self-destruct" and DISSOLVE at the very "precise"
momement of (what should be) IMPACT ....
But there is no apparent impact, is there.
The "precise" just causes it to just perfectly "disapppear" (with no
visible surfact impact).....

Very precise ...
precise video cartoon horseshit.





--- In 911InsideJobbers@yahoogroups.com, "ron_winn" <ron_winn@...> wrote:
>
> This is my observations from drawings that appear in the book "102
Minutes" these drawings are from simulations done by Weidlinger
Associates. They are drawings showing the planes about to enter the
buildings until [I assume] the planes came to rest. The timings go up
in increments of 8 seconds. Six stages are shown and the first 0
seconds is impact time.[evidently these drawings appeared in the New
York Times]
>
> The only conclusion from these drawings is that the cores did not
prevent the forward motion of both planes. That is how Weidlinger
Associates reckon it happened. Sounds like a German company. Anyone we
know?
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: alexldent
> To: 911InsideJobbers@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Monday, May 29, 2006 3:03 PM
> Subject: [911InsideJobbers] Re: That's all folks. Case solved.
>
>
> >>>both planes took 40 seconds to come to rest inside the two
> buildings.<<<
>
> What are you talking about?
>
> One important point I'm not sure you realize is that a Boeing 767
> going into the South tower, as UA175 was alleged to have, the fuselage
> would have impacted the core, not just the wing.
>
>
>
> --- In 911InsideJobbers@yahoogroups.com, "ron_winn" <ron_winn@> wrote:
> >
> > Computer simulations of both hits on the towers were done on
behalf of
> > the National Institute of Standards and Technology by Weidlinger
> > Associates.
> >
> > You will of course have to accept that the center cores of both
towers
> > did not act in anyway to the prevent the planes from totally
entering
> > the buildings.
> >
> > It will be harder for you to accept it in relation to 175 when you
> > discover that 175 chose the side of the south tower with the
shortest
> > space between the outer wall and the center core. The center cores
> > were both rectangular and the one in the south tower the core ran
> > south to north and the one in the north tower ran east to west.
> >
> > It's as though this was reckoned upon when 11 hit in the center and
> > 175 hit off center but however you look on it you must forget the
> > cores acted as resistence to these attacking planes because they
> > didn't. It's a fact that flight 175's target spot was so precise
that
> > it mainly by passed the centre core of the south tower and at
the same
> > time was breaking up as it went through. That too was so
precise. The
> > breaking up was so precise to have caused it to totally disappear
> > inside the building.
> >
> > One slow-mo of 175 shows the tail stop for a moment before it glides
> > into the building. This is because the port wing had penetrated the
> > core along its full length and had come up against a little
resistence
> > [at the same time the front of the fuselage had totally been
> > destroyed] until the wing root could take no more and disentergrated
> > and then been ripped of the fuselage. The starboard wing and the
> > fuselage, from the wings to the rear ended up moving along the east
> > side of the tower and just stopped short of coming full pelt through
> > the corner of the north wall and none of it came bursting
through the
> > east wall.
> >
> > So the south tower, which allowed 175 to enter it so easily didn't
> > want to let it go so easily. You may call that precision flying.
> >
> > The interesting thing is that flight 11 crashed right through
the core
> > and nearly got through to piercing the south wall because it
only had
> > the short width of the core to get through but then the north tower
> > didn't want to give up its intruder so easily either.
> >
> > And the most amazing thing is that both planes took 40 seconds
to come
> > to rest inside the two buildings.
> >
> > That's how it was done. With precision.
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
> SPONSORED LINKS Jolly rogers Politics Investigative journalism
> Media source
>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
> a.. Visit your group "911InsideJobbers" on the web.
>
> b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> 911InsideJobbers-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service.
>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>







SPONSORED LINKS
Jolly rogers Politics Investigative journalism
Media source

YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS


Posted by at

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)