There are 4 messages in this issue.
Topics in this digest:
1. "Free Trade" Impacts Sovereignty
From: "norgesen" <norgeson@hotmail.com>
2. Congresswoman Says America Run By Criminal Syndicate
From: "smacko" <smacko9@comcast.net>
3. The Veil of Materialism
From: "norgesen" <norgeson@hotmail.com>
4. The Open Conspiracy
From: "norgesen" <norgeson@hotmail.com>
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 1
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 18:19:30 -0500
From: "norgesen" <norgeson@hotmail.com>
Subject: "Free Trade" Impacts Sovereignty
"Free Trade" Impacts Sovereignty
by John F. McManus
February 20, 2006
America's ability to make its own laws and rules in every aspect of life is being transferred piecemeal to the UN's World Trade Organization.
The underlying goal of the drive for so-called free-trade agreements has always been control of national sovereignty. When the world-government advocates couldn't entice nations to give complete control of their governments to the United Nations via some single act, they aimed to achieve this goal through incremental power grabs by such UN subsidiary groups as the World Trade Organization (WTO).
U.S. participation in the UN began with Senate approval of the UN Charter in July 1945. By far the most important individual responsible for bringing the UN into existence -- even writing its charter -- was Alger Hiss. Later found to be a secret communist agent whose loyalty to the USSR superseded any devotion to his native America, Hiss would also play a pivotal role as the chairman of the U.S. delegation at the founding conference of the International Trade Organization (ITO) in Havana, Cuba, in 1947.
Various members of the U.S. Congress immediately concluded that the ITO was "a charter for trade control." Representative Samuel Pettingill (D-Ind.) said the ITO was "part and parcel of international socialism, one-worldism, and the slow surrender of national sovereignty." When several top-ranking business groups joined in with additional condemnations of the ITO, the issue never came up for a vote and Congress was spared the task of considering membership for our nation.
Faced with temporary defeat, the advocates of world government bided their time, changed the name of their proposal to the Geneva-based World Trade Organization (WTO), and finally gained U.S. admission to it in 1994. Its most important champion, Congressman Newt Gingrich (R-Ga.), unabashedly labeled the vote on WTO membership "a transformational moment [through which] we are transferring from the United States at a practical level significant authority to a new organization." Over the past decade, the WTO -- prominently listed by the UN on its organizational chart -- has ruled against U.S. tax laws, cotton subsidies, steel tariffs, oil importation, and more. The U.S. Constitution grants power to Congress alone to "regulate commerce with foreign nations," but this doesn't seem to bother the globalists in and out of government.
Never shy about the UN's ultimate goal, the authors of a 1995 UN document entitled Our Global Neighborhood (OGN) described the WTO as "a crucial building block for global economic governance." The key word here, of course, is "governance." This means that the WTO intends to flex its muscles in far more than just trade. The UN boldly admitted its overall intention with WTO by stating in OGN that the falsely labeled trade pact was designed to create rules "that go way beyond what has been traditionally thought of as 'trade.'"
Ten years later, a 2005 WTO publication entitled Understanding the WTO proudly noted that "regional trading groups" are already speeding the organization toward its ultimate goal. Pointing to examples of the continuing drive to have trade groups bring about world rule, this document proudly lists the "European Union, the North American Free Trade Agreement [NAFTA]" and several additional Asian and South American trading blocs as its regional trading groups. With 148 member nations already in the WTO and a growing number of trade groups currently in its grasp, the WTO is fast realizing the goals established by Alger Hiss and his world government-promoting allies six decades ago.
Those who seek to expand NAFTA have claimed that the proposed Free Trade Area of the Americas (FTAA) is a duplicate for the Western Hemisphere of what the EU has already done for its 25 European members. And they're correct. The EU Constitution is chock full of references to the United Nations. Now proceeding through a nation-by-nation ratifying process, approval of the EU Constitution in Spain prompted that country's foreign minister, Miguel Angel Moratinos, to exult, "We are witnessing the last remnants of national politics."
Even though French and Dutch voters emphatically turned thumbs down on ratification of the recently written EU Constitution, conservative EU Parliament member Daniel Hannan told his British constituents, "You may have got the impression that the European Constitution was dead -- that the French felled it and the Dutch had pounded a stake into its heart. If so, think again. The Constitution is being implemented, clause by clause, as if the No votes had never happened."
Here in America, the Bush administration seems unwilling to risk defeat of FTAA in Congress. So provisions of this sovereignty-targeting pact are being implemented piecemeal in the same way as additional provisions of the EU pact are being fastened around the necks of Europe's once-sovereign nations. Here, the step-by-step progression into world government is being called "NAFTA Plus" by some, or the "Security and Prosperity Partnership" (SPP). What all of this really boils down to is an attempt at piecemeal transfer of sovereignty -- essentially America's ability to make its own laws and rules in every aspect of life, not just business deals -- to the UN's WTO.
All portions of this sovereignty-destroying program -- call it "NAFTA Plus" or "SPP" or "FTAA" -- must be blocked.
http://www.thenewamerican.com/artman/publish/article_3248.shtml
~~~
It's Legal Because I Say So
by William Norman Grigg
February 11, 2006
During his January 26 White House press conference, President Bush dealt with several questions about the administration's use of warrantless wiretaps.
�Your explanation on the monitoring program seems to say that when the nation is at war, the President, by definition, can order measures that might not be acceptable or even, perhaps, legal in peacetime,� observed one reporter. �And this seems to sound like something President Nixon once said, which was, �when the President does it, then that means it is not illegal� in the areas involving national security. So how do the two differ?�
Rather than objecting to this comparison, Mr. Bush actually embraced the astonishing claim made by the disgraced ex-president Nixon.
�Well, I said yesterday that other Presidents have used the same authority. I�ve had to use technology to protect the American people,� he stated. �Other Presidents � most Presidents believe that during a time of war, that we can use our authorities under the Constitution to make decisions necessary to protect us.�
Of course, the controversy doesn�t deal with the use of �technology,� or the use of presidential authority, but rather the claim made by Mr. Bush that he can authorize electronic surveillance without seeking a warrant � even though existing statutes would permit the administration to seek a warrant after the fact. The �other presidents� alluded to by Mr. Bush include Nixon, who would likely have been impeached had he not resigned � and among the impeachable offenses listed by Congress was his use of warrantless wiretaps, supposedly for �national security� purposes.
Rather than citing the specific grant of constitutional authority he claims justifies his actions, Mr. Bush � hewing to a sophistical legal strategy developed by his Justice Department � claims that Congress, by deferring to the exercise of extra-constitutional presidential power, has sanctified it.
�There is an act passed by Congress in 2001 which said that I must have the power to conduct this war using the incidents of war,� stated the president, without clarifying his peculiar use of the term �incidents.� �And I�m intending to use that power � Congress says, go ahead and conduct the war, we�re not going to tell you how to do it.... There will be a legal debate about whether or not I have the authority to do this; I�m absolutely convinced I do. Our Attorney General has been out describing why. And I�m going to continue using my authority. That�s what the American people expect.�
Mr. Bush�s tortured and poorly parsed statement conveyed exactly the same meaning that Richard Nixon packed in one elegantly arrogant phrase: �When the president does it, then that means it�s not illegal.�
http://www.thenewamerican.com/artman/publish/article_3319.shtml
[This message contained attachments]
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 2
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 22:58:40 -0800
From: "smacko" <smacko9@comcast.net>
Subject: Congresswoman Says America Run By Criminal Syndicate
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/february2006/140206criminalsyndicate.htm
Congresswoman Says America Run By Criminal Syndicate
McKinney: American citizens could be put in forced labor camps
Paul Joseph Watson & Alex Jones/Prison Planet.com | February 14 2006
Cynthia McKinney, the only House Representative to stand up to the Bush
White House crime syndicate, has gone further than ever before in her
efforts to warn people about what the Neo-Cons' ultimate goals actually
entail for freedom in America.
During a recent radio interview on the Alex Jones Show, McKinney illustrated
the nature of a corrupt occupational government, stating that the
administration was "stolen in 2000 and stolen again in 2004." McKinney said
that it was doing the government a favor to describe them as a "criminal
syndicate."
"It appears to me that our country is literally being hollowed out....our
economy is being hollowed out," said McKinney.
McKinney shared Alex Jones' fears and those previously voiced by Republican
Congressman Ron Paul, that Americans may be arrested and taken to forced
labor camps in light of recent developments confirming Kellogg Brown and
Root have secured a government contract to build the camps.
Regarding 9/11, McKinney lent credibility to the 9/11 truth scholars who
recently came forth with empirical evidence proving that the official story
is a fallacy.
"It's clear that something was terribly amiss on that day with our people
who were in charge....they didn't even follow standard operating procedure,"
said McKinney and the Congresswoman agreed that US authorities stood down on
9/11.
Covering the subject of worldwide human trafficking and sex slavery, a
practice embraced by Dyncorp and lobbied for by Halliburton subsidiary
representatives, McKinney responded by saying, "they steal elections with
the same ease that they steal women and little girls."
McKinney made headlines two years ago when she directly confronted Donald
Rumsfeld about the US government's collaboration with companies that engage
in human trafficking and the four wargames held on September 11.
McKinney highlighted the MK Ultra program as a past example of where the US
government had experimented with turning US soldiers into killing machines
and expressed her sadness that some troops were apparently under a similar
influence in light of the alarming incidents at Fort Bragg.
McKinney is spearheading a movement to have all records pertaining to the
death of Martin Luther King released. McKinney said that King was clearly
murdered.
"A jury said in 1999 that it was a US government conspiracy, including the
highest individuals at the highest levels of the United States government. I
have no reason to disbelieve them."
"If they would do that then to Martin Luther King Jnr. at a stage now where
we have a law that defines enemy combatants, we all could be enemy
combatants just by dissenting from what this administration does and they
could do the same thing to us."
McKinney scorned the federal government for their actions following
Hurricane Katrina.
"The American people were once again abandoned, they were abandoned by their
own government and Secretary Michael Chertoff has gotten off scott free on
this."
"They needed food and water and instead they were sent men with guns and
Blackwater mercenaries were hired to patrol the streets of New Orleans. This
is criminal! How can we have mercenaries patrolling the streets of America?"
"You had an administration that was AWOL and they had the nerve to bring
other folks up on criminal charges for even being conscientious objectors."
[This message contained attachments]
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 3
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 09:01:14 -0500
From: "norgesen" <norgeson@hotmail.com>
Subject: The Veil of Materialism
The Veil of Materialism
- by Phillip D. Collins �, Feb. 10th, 2006
As the mists of antiquity gradually receded and history welcomed modernity, the old theocratic power structures were gradually supplanted by secular theocracies governed by science. No doubt, the chronocentric impulses of the contemporary mind compel many to consider this shift an advancement in "political, social, and cultural evolution." However, although these new theocracies are veiled in secularism, it must be understood that their new state-sanctioned epistemology is a form of mysticism akin to its religious progenitor. This truth is illustrated by radical empiricism's rejection of causality, which stipulates the investment of faith in the purported results of scientific research. Likewise, the new state-sanctioned metaphysics is equally mystical in character. Accompanying radical empiricism is materialism, the metaphysical contention that matter holds primacy.
Naturalism works in tandem with materialism because it attempts to sustain the primacy of matter with the metaphysical claim of "self-creation" (i.e., abiogenesis). Of course, this claim suggests that living and dead matter are inseparable. Thus, living things are literally artificial entities that create themselves, an occult theme communicated through the Kabalistic myth of the golem. In a universe where materialistic metaphysics hold sway, the biosphere and the life it supports amount to one enormous golem. Accompanying this contention is the Gnostic doctrine of "self-salvation." If humanity is a god that created itself, then it is also responsible for its own salvation. Given these strange confluences of occult thought, materialism qualifies as little more than a new secular mysticism.
Not surprisingly, materialistic metaphysics pervade the fabric of many occult institutions. Even the acknowledgement of supra-sensible and incorporeal entities cannot hide the occultist's materialistic propensities. In fact, such propensities may have given rise to the occultist's mystical beliefs in the first place. Guenon explains:
Without seeking for the moment to determine more precisely the nature and quality of the supra-sensible, in so far as it is actually involved in this matter, it will be useful to observe how far the very people who still admit it and think that they are aware of its action are in reality penetrated by materialistic influence: for even if they do not deny all extra-corporeal reality, like the majority of their contemporaries, it is only because they have formed for themselves an idea of it which enables them in some way to assimilate it to the likeness of sensible things, and to do that is certainly scarcely better than to deny it. There is no reason to be surprised at this, considering the extent to which all the occultist, theosophist, and other schools of that sort are fond of searching assiduously for points of approach to modern scientific theories, from which they draw their inspiration more directly than they are prepared to admit; the result is what might logically be expected under such conditions. (153-54)
In this sense, materialism acts as a veil. The fact is that, although the occult theocracy of antiquity declined in power, it is still very much alive. It perpetuates itself through secularism. As sociologist William Sims Bainbridge makes clear, secularization actually represents the opening stage of an occult counterculture movement:
Secularization does not mean a decline in the need for religion, but only a loss of power by traditional denominations. Studies of the geography of religion show that where the churches become weak, cults and occultism explode to fill the spiritual vacuum. ("Religions for a Galactic Civilization")
Thus, the thoroughly secularized society merely presages the emergence of a new theocratic order. The new ecclesiastical authority shall be occult in character, embracing what Guenon calls "neo-spiritualism" (155). The galvanizing mythology of this new theocratic order will most likely reflect the paradigmatic character of the Gnostic cosmology, depicting humanity as a collection of pluralities awaiting unification into a singularity through the sorcery of "science." As for the dominant religion, it will be Luciferianism, which was initially disseminated on the popular level as secular humanism. This is [the] anatomy of the emergent "Satanic state."
In addition to facilitating the rise of a new occult theocracy, materialism has also contributed to the enormous volumes of bloodshed witnessed by the 20th century. Arguably, contemporary regimes premised upon dialectical materialism have murdered far more people than any traditional theocracy premised upon a theistic faith. This is directly attributable to materialism's emphasis upon the primacy of matter. Materialistic metaphysics preclude the spirit, confining moral questions to the ontological plane of the physical universe. Severed from their ontological source, moral principles become tantamount to material phenomena. Thus, in a universe where materialism holds sway, it is reasonable to assume that evil is a purely corporeal entity that can be physically expunged. The ramifications of such an outlook are disturbing. In the article "What Evil Is and Why It Matters," Christian philosopher John Paul Jones reveals the consequences of this Weltanschauung:
According to this [materialist] methodology, all we need do is find the material cause of evil and destroy it. After, all, since materialists assume all causes are material, they are logically obliged and conceptually predisposed to assume that evil is itself caused by material, physically destructible things or causes. (64)
The outgrowth of this paradigm is what Jones calls the "search and destroy" approach to dealing with evil (64). Jones expands on this approach:
Consequently, those of a materialist mindset, whether Christian or otherwise, are constantly engaged in campaigns to destroy the evil things or people they think are at the root of the problem. So we have, for example, the "war on drugs," the "war on guns," the "class war" and various genocides--all of which are known to cause more evil than they allegedly uproot, and today, as we witness the spread of eco-fascism in Europe that holds that we can solve the reputed environmental crisis by simply exterminating many millions of people, we also witness the approval of Chinese population control techniques, such as state-sanctioned abortion, infanticide, and forced sterilization. Strange fruits and bad apples, all. (64)
After years of war and waste, the materialist state is still incapable of expunging evil. This failure is directly attributable to materialism's misappropriation of matter as the totality of reality. In light of this metaphysical error, one is still left to ponder the source of evil. Yet, Biblical wisdom, which the materialist thoroughly rejects, may have already answered the question of evil. James 4:1-10 states:
From whence come wars and fighting among you? Come they not hence, even of your lusts that war in your members? Ye lust and have not; ye kill, and desire to have, and cannot obtain; ye fight and war, yet have not, because ye ask not. ye ask, and receive not, because ye ask amiss, that ye may consume it upon your lusts. Ye adulterers and adulteresses, know ye not that the friendship of the world is enmity with God? Whosoever therefore will be a friend of the world is the enemy of God? Do ye think that the scripture saith in vain, the Spirit that dwelleth in us lusteth to envy? But he giveth more grace. Wherefore he saith, God resisteth the proud, but giveth grace unto the humble. Submit yourselves therefore to God. Resist the devil, and he will flee from you. Draw nigh to God, and he will draw nigh to you. Cleanse your hands, ye sinners; and purify your hearts, ye doubleminded. Be afflicted, and mourn, and weep; let your laughter be turned to mourning, and your joy to heaviness. Humble yourselves in the sight of the Lord, and he shall lift you up.
Of course, such a conclusion is unthinkable to the materialist. It is interesting that Charles Fort believed:
that man deliberately invented the dogma of materialism in order to shield himself from the evidence of what was being done to him by means of psycho-spiritual warfare methods hyped by "coincidence," symbolism and ritual. (Hoffman 68)
A metaphysical smoke screen currently obstructs humanity's view of the spiritual principles upon which so many of the world's dilemmas rest. It is the veil of materialism.
Sources Cited
a.. Bainbridge, William Sims. "Religions for a Galactic Civilization." Excerpted from Science Fiction and Space Futures, edited by Eugene M. Emme. San Diego: American Astronautical Society, pages 187-201, 1982.
b.. Guenon, Rene. The Reign of Quantity and the Signs of the Times. Trans. Lord Northbourne. Baltimore, Maryland: Penguin Books Inc, 1953.
c.. Hoffman, Michael. Secret Societies and Psychological Warfare. Coeur d'Alene, Idaho: Independent History & Research, 2001.
d.. Jones, John Paul. "What Evil Is and Why It Matters." Paranoia Magazine Issue 33 (2003): 62-64.
About the Author
Phillip D. Collins acted as the editor for The Hidden Face of Terrorism. He has also written articles for Paranoia Magazine, MKzine, News With Views, B.I.P.E.D.: The Official Website of Darwinian Dissent and Conspiracy Archive. He has an Associate of Arts and Science. Currently, he is studying for a bachelor's degree in Communications at Wright State University. During the course of his seven-year college career, Phillip has studied philosophy, religion, and classic literature. He also co-authored the book, The Ascendancy of the Scientific Dictatorship: An Examination of Epistemic Autocracy, From the 19th to the 21st Century, which is available online here. He also moderates the Yahoo discussion group "Panoptic Age."
http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/Commentary/Materialism.htm
[This message contained attachments]
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 4
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 09:27:32 -0500
From: "norgesen" <norgeson@hotmail.com>
Subject: The Open Conspiracy
THE OPEN CONSPIRACY - by H.G. Wells Enthuiastic Supporter of New World Order
THE OPEN CONSPIRACY
by H. G. Wells
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary: 'The Open Conspiracy' was Wells' 'Blue print for a world revolution'; he regarded this book as his finished statement on the way the world ought to be ordered. Possibly he underestimated, or ignored, the fact that it is often in the interest of subsets of the human race to act against other subsets. Moreover the emphasis on religion seems odd, from a rationalist.
Wells changed publishers rather freely, and I've found it impossible to locate the copyright holder(s) of this title. However, there are more than a dozen other Wells titles scanned in on Internet. I would ask interested readers not to download this book, however, at least pro tem. - Rae West
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Introduction: H. G. Wells (1866-1946) entirely by chance came across an application form to study under T. H. Huxley; after his education in London, and writing a biology textbook, he became a prolific writer of fiction, first gaining widespread fame with 'The Time Machine' in 1895; he wrote humorous novels based on his own life (The Wheels of Chance, Kipps..) and in 1900 published 'Anticipations of the Reaction of Mechanical and Scientific Progress on Human Life and Thought' based on lectures at the Royal Institution, where Faraday and others had lectured.
After the First World War, observing the lack of knowledge of most people about most things, he turned to history, starting, in 1918, his 'Outline of History' first published in parts with 'gorgeous' covers, then in 1920 as a two-volume work including colour plates of a lavish nature for the time. In effect it was jointly authored - his chapters were sent to collaborators, and the resulting multiple corrections reassembled by the duly-chastened Wells. A 'popular' one volume edition appeared in 1930. By the standards of its time this was a best-seller. It was praised decades later by A J P Taylor as 'still the best introduction to history'. Toynbee had a favourable opinion of it. During the 1920s it sparked a controversy with Hilaire Belloc, who believed in such things as the 'Fall of Man'. It was also attacked by a teacher of Greek. Wells' hopes that school history could be taught in an international sense still, of course, have not come to fruition.
He planned and collaborated a hefty set of volumes on biology, The Science of Life, with his own son, and with Julian Huxley; the theme was largely evolutionary ('The Origin of Species' was published only a few years before his birth). Huxley, a descendant of T H Huxley, regarded Wells as something of a Cockney upstart.
And he wrote a descriptive, rather than analytical, book on economics, which includes many ingenious observations but was eclipsed by Keynes' General Theory of four years later.
Some of his books were filmed; his 'Invisible Man' was turned into a filmscript by Preston Sturges, who however regarded his books as not very filmable and infuriated Wells by making the invisible man mad. Another media incident was Orson Welles' radio broadcast of 'War of the Worlds' in 1938, involving aggressive Martians landing in a location Americanised from its original Surrey, and which was reported to have cause mass panic among less educated Americans on the eastern seaboard.
C.P. Snow wrote of Wells that he could 'throw out a phrase that crystallised a whole argument', and that he 'never heard anyone remotely in the same class.' Among these phrases were 'the War that will end War', coined when he worked with the Ministry of Propaganda under Northcliffe during the First World War, which he supported, and 'the New World Order', which he seemed to be the first to use, or popularise, in a 1940 book of that title. His less successful phrases included the 'competent receiver'. He said of himself that he 'worked all the time'.
He was a socialist of an empirical, rather vague, rationalist type, disliking Marx and unenthusiastic about the managerial socialism of the Webbs.
His book 'The Open Conspiracy' was published in 1928, subtitled 'Blue Prints for a World Revolution'. Bertrand Russell said of this book '.. I do not know of anything with which I agree more entirely' though since this was in a begging letter perhaps he was just being polite. It was revised and republished as 'What Are We to Do with Our Lives?' in 1931.
In this short book, Wells attempts to answer the question: What should socialists actually do? - to which he confessed several times to having no very clear idea. It's a counter to Marx: why shouldn't non-proletarians unite to change the world?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quotations:
'This book states as plainly and clearly as possibly the essential ideas of my life, the perspective of my world. ... the subject of this book is the whole destiny of man..'
'If I could, I would put this book before every mind in the world. I would say, tell me where this is wrong, or tell me why you do not live after these principles. .. My idiom of thought may not be his. Will he forgive that for the sake of the substance I am putting before him? .. Will the reader at least try to understand before he refutes?'
'... a movement to realize the conceivable better state of the world must deny itself the advantages of secret methods and tactical insincerities. It must leave that to its adversaries. We must declare our end plainly from the outset and risk no misunderstandings of our procedure.'
'A time will come when men will sit with history before them or with some old newspaper before them and ask incredulously, "Was there ever such a world?"'
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Above Notes by Rae West (Information from: Wells's Experiment in Autobiography, The Outline of History, The New Teaching of History, and e.g. 'The Fate of Homo Sapiens': '.. far from being "Mr. Know-all", I am helpless ignorance, in a sea of unconscious ignorance'; Michael Foot remark on A J P Taylor; Toynbee's Study of History; Martin Gardner's 'Fads and Fallacies..' has one account of the Orson Welles incident; Julian Huxley, Memories; Bertrand Russell, Autobiography vol II; C P Snow, Variety of Men; Preston Sturges.., ed Anne Sturges. The 'infuriated' comment is however from TV)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CONTENTS
I - THE PRESENT CRISIS IN HUMAN AFFAIRS 15K
II - THE IDEA OF THE OPEN CONSPIRACY 5K
III - WE HAVE TO CLEAR AND CLEAN UP OUR MINDS 16K
IV - THE REVOLUTION IN EDUCATION 3K
V - RELIGION IN THE NEW WORLD 15K
VI - MODERN RELIGION IS OBJECTIVE 8K
VII - WHAT MANKIND HAS TO DO 11k
VIII - BROAD CHARACTERISTICS OF A SCIENTIFIC WORLD COMMONWEAL 27K
IX - NO STABLE UTOPIA IS NOW CONCEIVABLE 2K
X - THE OPEN CONSPIRACY IS NOT TO BE THOUGHT OF AS A SINGLE ORGANIZATION; IT IS A CONCEPTION OF LIFE OUT OF WHICH EFFORTS, ORGANIZATIONS, AND NEW ORIENTATIONS WILL ARISE 13K
XI - FORCES AND RESISTANCES IN THE GREAT MODERN COMMUNITIES NOW PREVALENT, WHICH ARE ANTAGONISTIC TO THE OPEN CONSPIRACY. THE WAR WITH TRADITION 31k
XII - THE RESISTANCES OF THE LESS INDUSTRIALIZED PEOPLES TO THE DRIVE OF THE OPEN CONSPIRACY 19K
XIII - RESISTANCES AND ANTAGONISTIC FORCES IN OUR CONSCIOUS AND UNCONSCIOUS SELVES 16K
XIV - THE OPEN CONSPIRACY BEGINS AS A MOVEMENT OF DISCUSSION, EXPLANATION, AND PROPAGANDA 13K
XV - EARLY CONSTRUCTIVE WORK OF THE OPEN CONSPIRACY 23K
XVI - EXISTING AND DEVELOPING MOVEMENTS WHICH ARE CONTRIBUTORY TO THE OPEN CONSPIRACY AND WHICH MUST DEVELOP A COMMON CONSCIOUSNESS. THE PARABLE OF PROVINDER ISLAND 16K
XVII - THE CREATIVE HOME, SOCIAL GROUP, AND SCHOOL: THE PRESENT WASTE OF IDEALISTIC WILL 7K
XVIII - PROGRESSIVE DEVELOPMENT OF THE ACTIVITIES OF THE OPEN CONSPIRACY INTO A WORLD CONTROL AND COMMONWEAL: THE HAZARDS OF THE ATTEMPT 10K
XIX - HUMAN LIFE IN THE COMING WORLD COMMUNITY 4K
http://www.mega.nu:8080/ampp/hgwells/hg_cont.htm
[This message contained attachments]
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/september_eleven_vreeland/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
september_eleven_vreeland-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
No comments:
Post a Comment